tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826231802859523569.post4616278771596360154..comments2024-02-12T03:21:03.402-08:00Comments on Ron Martinsen's Photography Blog: REVIEW: Fujifilm XQ1-The Ultimate Compact Point & Shoot? (Review Part II of II)ronmartblog.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06815090271742112506noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826231802859523569.post-46383220237212890462014-01-04T09:11:17.425-08:002014-01-04T09:11:17.425-08:00Very useful review. Unfortunately I read this revi...Very useful review. Unfortunately I read this review too late !! I have had the confirmation of my advice as regards the FujiXQ1 of which I'm owner since the first days of December 2013.This camera does not be worthy of 400 Euro I spent .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826231802859523569.post-88890858190637561182014-01-03T12:27:47.433-08:002014-01-03T12:27:47.433-08:00Naturally there's a lot more detail in the RAW...Naturally there's a lot more detail in the RAW which is why I keep recommending using Noiseware which would allow for a better balance of detail preservation and noise reduction. With that said, one major loss is that you can't use the Fuji film systems when doing RAW processing (in ACR & LR), so you lose some of the charm offered by the Fujifilm X series. <br /><br />Ronronmartblog.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06815090271742112506noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5826231802859523569.post-41392749111396498342014-01-03T10:56:13.559-08:002014-01-03T10:56:13.559-08:00Thanks for the review. Just a question: you wrote ...Thanks for the review. Just a question: you wrote that you used RAW whenever possible, then complained about destructive NR which is JPEG only.<br />What are your findings for RAW-only users?<br />Many TIAAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com