Saturday, June 13, 2026

Epson SureColor P900 Review: A Worthy Successor to the P800 and 3880?

Camera ReviewRonMartBlog

Epson SureColor P900 Review: A Worthy Successor to the P800 and 3880?

After 50+ prints across glossy, luster, baryta, metallic, and textured matte papers, the Epson SureColor P900 has proven capable of outstanding results. The larger lesson is that paper choice, ICC profiles, media settings, rendering intent, and borderless expansion can matter more than the operating system or the printing application.

Epson SureColor P900 Review: A Worthy Successor to the P800 and 3880? product photo
Epson SureColor P900 Review: A Worthy Successor to the P800 and 3880? — click to check current price / availability

TL;DR ⚡

The P900 is a predictable, versatile 17-inch fine-art printer capable of superb output. Correct profiles and settings produced closely matched results from Windows, macOS, Photoshop, and Epson Print Layout. Black improvement is the biggest difference - days of wasting ink and waiting for swapping between photo and matte black ink are over and carbon black setting result in the best DMax ever for Epson.

Provisional verdict: recommended for serious photographers who demand the best color accuracy and reliability.

Table of Contents

  1. Who it’s for and who should skip
  2. Pros and cons
  3. What I Tested
  4. Setup, Software & Color Management
  5. Rendering Intent Comparison
  6. Print Quality Findings
  7. Real World Shots
  8. Closing thoughts
  9. Recommended products
  10. Related articles

Who it’s for

  • Photographers producing exhibition-quality prints up to 17 inches wide.
  • P800 or 3880 owners who want improved black performance and improved range of color.
  • Users printing on premium papers like baryta, metallic, and textured fine-art media.
  • Photographers willing to use ICC profiles, soft proofing, and controlled print settings.

Who should skip

  • Anyone looking for inexpensive, low-maintenance casual printing.
  • Users who do not want to manage profiles, media types, and application-versus-driver color settings.
  • Photographers who routinely need output wider than 17 inches.
  • Enthusiasts who can't see the difference between discount prints and premium color managed prints.

✅ Pros

  • Excellent output across varied mediaStrong color, tonal separation, and detail on glossy through textured matte papers.
  • Dedicated Photo Black and Matte BlackParity with Canon so no more costly and time consuming swaps between black ink types.
  • Strong color and monochrome workflowsImproved color gamut and Advanced Black & White Photo mode continues to produce excellent results.
  • Epson Print Layout reduces setup riskIt keeps more of the relevant print controls visible in one application.
  • Epson Media InstallerFinally Epson catches up with Canon's Media Configuration Tool to control media handling settings.

⛔ Cons

  • On my systems, wireless printing failed to work on Windows 11Unlike the P800, wired USB was the better route for me with the P900.
  • Poor Roll SupportP800 roll adapter isn't compatable, so a new P900 adapter is required that still lacks a cutting solution.
  • ⚖️macOS wireless reliability needs more testingDuring a Cold Press Natural print, wireless triggered one 'device restarted' error from the sheet feeder.
  • ⚖️Operating costMaintenance-box needed replacement after only 30 prints, and starter inks were almost exhausted.

What I Tested

  • Print set: 30 tracked prints, plus 20+ untracked prints made between May 9 and June 12, 2026.
  • Platforms: Windows 11 and macOS Tahoe.
  • Applications: Photoshop 27.8/27.9 and Epson Print Layout 1.5.15/1.5.16.
  • Drivers: Epson Windows driver 6.12.00 and Mac driver 13.26.
  • Rendering: Relative Colorimetric, Perceptual, Saturation, and Advanced Black & White Photo.
  • Media: Epson Luster, Cold Press Natural, Legacy Platine/Baryta/Etching/Fibre, Metallic Glossy/Luster, Photo Glossy, Premium Semi-Gloss, and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Metallic.

Setup, Software & Color Management

The Windows driver will look familiar to experienced Epson users. For a Photoshop-managed workflow, the exact printer-and-paper ICC profile is selected in Photoshop, Black Point Compensation is enabled, the matching media type is selected in the driver, and Color Adjustment is set to Off (No Color Adjustment).

The Mac driver exposes the same essential controls with a different presentation. Epson Print Layout offers the cleaner single-application workflow because the image, profile, media type, layout, and output settings stay visible together. I found no print-quality reason to prefer Windows or macOS: with matched settings, the scanned evaluation prints closely matched.

Epson Print Layout vs. Photoshop

Both produced strong results when configured correctly. The practical difference is workflow safety: Photoshop is more flexible, but it is easier to create contradictory settings between Photoshop and the driver.

Paper Matters More Than the Application

The clearest visual changes came from paper surface and paper white. Legacy Platine and Baryta produced rich contrast; Metallic Glossy was punchier; Legacy Etching and Fibre changed perceived contrast, black depth, and fine detail through their matte texture. The right question is not which paper wins, but whether the P900 preserves convincing color, tonal separation, and detail on each surface. It does.

Quality Level 5 Carbon Black vs. Maximum Quality

Both settings produced excellent results with Carbon Black offering better DMax which most will only see if they measure the output with a spectrophotometer. The average person won't see the difference, so if you fall into that camp then just using LEVEL 5 Maximum Quality will save a little ink. Personally, I use Carbon Black as often as I can.

Rendering Intent Comparison

The cleanest direct comparison is Relative Colorimetric versus Saturation on Epson Metallic Photo Paper Glossy (prints 14 and 15), which share the same paper and quality setting. The Perceptual examples below were printed on different papers, so they show how that intent behaved across the broader test rather than serving as a strict intent-only comparison.

Print 14 Metallic Glossy, Relative Colorimetric
Print 14: Metallic Photo Paper Glossy, Q5 Carbon Black, Relative Colorimetric (Photoshop, Windows 11).
Print 15 Metallic Glossy, Saturation
Print 15: Metallic Photo Paper Glossy, Q5 Carbon Black, Saturation (Epson Print Layout, macOS).
Print 8 Legacy Baryta, Perceptual
Print 8: Legacy Baryta, Q5 Carbon Black, Perceptual (Photoshop, macOS).
Print 10 Legacy Etching, Perceptual
Print 10: Legacy Etching, Maximum Quality, Perceptual (Epson Print Layout, Windows 11).

The differences among these scans are generally smaller than the differences produced by changing paper surface and paper white. Prints 8 and 10 show Perceptual succeeding on baryta and textured matte, but should not be used to attribute every visual difference to rendering intent alone.

Practical conclusion: Rendering intent matters most for colors near or beyond the destination gamut. Perceptual preserves relationships among compressed colors, Relative Colorimetric preserves in-gamut accuracy, and Saturation favors vividness — but none replaces soft proofing and a physical proof print.

Real World Shots πŸ“·

The photos below are real-world samples. Click any photo to open the original size.

Click here to view the entire gallery of images taken for this review.

Visit the gallery for a sample of Epson v750 scans of prints made during this review

Real-world shot 1
Prints cover cross-platform, application, paper, rendering-intent, quality, and monochrome tests.

Visit the gallery to view a wide selection of scans made of the prints done during this review. Please refer to the filename legend in the gallery to decode the settings for each print. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

The Windows Epson driver, with media, mode, quality, source, and color-adjustment controls visible.

Real-world shot 2
Windows driver 6.12.00 during print 1 on Ultra Premium Photo Paper Luster.

For Photoshop-managed color, the driver must use Off (No Color Adjustment) to avoid double color management. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

The matching macOS driver exposes the same essential controls with a different presentation.

Real-world shot 3
Mac driver 13.26 during print 2, with the same paper, quality, and rendering intent as print 1.

The closely matched results make platform choice a workflow preference, not a print-quality decision. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

Advanced Black & White Photo mode on Legacy Etching with a Warm/Dark treatment.

Real-world shot 4
Print 16: Legacy Etching, Maximum Quality, Advanced Black & White, Warm/Dark.

The warm treatment and matte texture reinforce the vintage character. Full workflow: How To: Using Epson's Advanced B&W Photo (ABW). Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

Print 17 is a great black-and-white example that shows off the deep DMax, this time on smoother, photo-black Legacy Platine.

Real-world shot 5
Print 17: Legacy Platine, Quality 5 Carbon Black, Relative Colorimetric (Photoshop, Windows 11).

Compared with textured Legacy Etching, Platine gives the monochrome image a smoother surface, deeper-looking blacks, and a more conventional photographic character. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

A small section of my favorite 13x19 prints that were family favorites for their amazing color

Real-world shot 6
Prints 25, 22, and 20 show how paper choice can complement very different photographs.

<strong>Print 25:</strong> Hahnemühle Photo Rag Metallic turned out fantastic and will be framed.
<strong>Print 22:</strong> Epson Metallic Photo Paper Luster was claimed on the spot by my son for his personal use.
<strong>Print 20:</strong> Legacy Platine gave my favorite photo of my youngest daughter a result worthy of a prominent place in my studio beside my desk. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

Prints 24 and 26 show the limits of correcting an intensely saturated source for a metallic paper.
In this photo of my son Kai in his football uniform, the blues fall outside the printable gamut of Epson Metallic Photo Paper Glossy. I adjusted the file until Photoshop's soft-proof warnings were satisfied, but the corrected print still looked nearly the same as the first attempt.

Real-world shot 7
Prints 24 and 26: the corrected file satisfied Photoshop's soft-proof warnings, yet the physical prints retained nearly the same blue-to-purple problem.
Real-world shot 7
Photoshop warned me before I printed print 24, but sometimes substitutions save the day so I gave it a try - and it failed.
Real-world shot 7
Here's print 24 as shown in Epson Print Layout and notice how it doesn't show any gamut warnings.
Real-world shot 7
For print 24, soft proofing in Photoshop and the Photoshop pring dialog looked good

As print 24 shows, clearing an on-screen gamut warning does not guarantee a corrected print.

I also went to Photoshop to print and changed the rendering intent from Relative Colormetric to Perceptual which was a mistake. This is totally my fault and I know better, but I was careless. It's a good reminder that even those with a lot of print experience can make mistakes too.

Paper, profile, neighboring colors, and viewing conditions matter, so a small proof print remains the decisive test. This user error can easily be handled by doing test prints using a series of small crops from problematic areas in a small print as I discussed in Printing 101 book.

The printing of the 17x22-inch, Print 30, on Ultra Premium Photo Paper Luster.

Real-world shot 8
Print 30, the 17x22-inch sheet continues through feeder with no hassle on the P900.

Like its predecessors, unless you are using thick substrates (paper) that scratch easily, it's safe to use the rear feeder for large prints. However, I did test and recommend the front manual feeder with lots of space behind the printer when using thicker matte finish substrates. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

The completed Print 30 did one of my favorite photos justice by producing outstanding color and detail

Real-world shot 9
Print 30: completed 17x22-inch print on Ultra Premium Photo Paper Luster.

I loved this print. The compact P900 produced a result with enough presence and quality to stand beside one of my favorite large-format Canon PRO-2000 prints. An iPhone photo of a print will never do it justice compared to viewing it in real life under a GTI Lightbox. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

I love the new LED panel that displays the print and its settings while printing

Real-world shot 10
P900 Adjustable color touch screen

You can swipe to get more settings while printing to ensure that the print received the correct settings right at the start of your print job while there is still time to cancel. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

My first two prints were a a status page and nozzle check on a piece of Velvet Fine Art paper I had lying around

Real-world shot 11
LED displays ink settings in full color

Ink levels shown are how much ink I had in the cartridges that came with the printer, and the far right image shows that the maintenance tank started out nearly empty. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

Here's what the P900 network status page looks like

Real-world shot 12
First two prints - Status and Nozzle Check

I flipped the paper and did a nozzle check on the bottom and all looked great, so it was time to print Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

I was disappointed how quickly this message came up while there was still plenty of ink left

Real-world shot 13
Maintenance box end of life warning on Epson Status Monitor 3 for Windows

This makes me wonder if you'll need about 3 of these per ink set based on my experience. Fortunately they were only $26 USD at the time this article was written. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

No Carbon Black for you if you want borderless!

Real-world shot 14
I was disappointed that I had to use Quality Level 3 to print borderless

LEVEL 4, LEVEL 5 & LEVEL 5 [Carbon Black] will give you a warning and uncheck the borderless option for you if you try use it with these quality settings. Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

I like to have detailed filenames, but they may not make sense to you so I created this Legend

Real-world shot 15
Reference this sheet when trying to understand the cryptic filenames of the scanned files in the photo gallery

Consider this as a good thing to print out using plain paper settings and a lower quality setting to simplify your experience while viewing the photo gallery Click the photo to open the original size πŸ‘†

Closing Thoughts

The Epson SureColor P900 has delivered consistently excellent output across a wider range of media than most photographers will use regularly, and it worked well from Photoshop and Epson Print Layout on both Windows and macOS. Correct profiles and settings produced close cross-platform results.

Compared with the P800 and 3880, my final recommendation is that it is a worthy upgrade thanks to improved media handling, dedicated photo and matte black to avoid the cost and delays of switching, physical size improvements, and a newer ink set that shows a visible advantage.

My experience is positive enough to recommend the P900 as a serious 17-inch desktop fine-art printer. The evidence supports a more useful conclusion than declaring every setting superior: the P900 is predictable, versatile, and capable of superb results when the person driving it chooses the correct media and color management settings.

πŸ‘‰ Click here to learn more

Sunday, May 3, 2026

Kyoto Girl 2026 Edit - Revisiting old photos again

Camera ReviewRonMartBlog

Kyoto Girl 2026 Edit - Revisiting old photos again

For those of us who have been editing photos for a decade or more, there are countless images we once considered finished masterpieces—judged by the standards and tools available at the time. As editing software has evolved, it’s often worth revisiting some of those favorites and starting fresh, using modern versions of the very same tools we relied on years ago.

I decided to do exactly that with this image, which was featured on the Imagenomic website for many years.

I hope you enjoy this refreshed look at how I originally edited the photo, along with a quick comparison showing how today’s improvements to those same tools can deliver dramatically better results.1

Table of Contents

  1. Video review
  2. Closing thoughts
  3. Related articles

Video Review πŸŽ₯

If the player doesn’t load here, watch on YouTube.

Closing Thoughts

Thanks for checking this out! I’m curious—what editing tools do you think have changed the most over the years? Are there any products you’d love to see me re‑edit past photos with or dive into in a future review?

Friday, April 24, 2026

Imagenomic Portraiture 5 Review (2026): Pro-Level Skin Retouching Without the Plastic Look

Software ReviewSkin SofteningPortrait Enhancements

Imagenomic Portraiture 5 Review (2026): Pro-Level Skin Retouching

Imagenomic Portraiture just got a major upgrade. Its intelligent auto‑masking speeds up the workflow by accurately identifying where skin softening should apply with minimal manual input. New features like Fill Light make it easy to brighten faces without complex masking, while Uniformity helps balance facial tones for a more polished look. Improved sharpness tools bring texture back naturally, and the upgraded shine‑reduction effectively eliminates harsh hotspots—making the overall retouching process faster, smoother, and more professional.

Imagenomic Portraiture 5 Review & Discount product photo
Imagenomic Portraiture 5 Review & Discount — click to check current price / availability

TL;DR ⚡

The new Imagenomic Portraiture is faster and smarter. Auto‑masking needs almost no manual input, Fill Light brightens faces easily, Uniformity balances skin tones, improved sharpness restores natural texture, and shine‑reduction removes harsh hotspots.

A smarter, faster Portraiture provides realistic skin softening that brightens faces, evens tones, restores texture, and removes shine with minimal effort.

Table of Contents

  1. Who it’s for and who should skip
  2. Pros and cons
  3. Video review and tutorial
  4. Before & After
  5. Closing thoughts

Who it’s for

  • Studio Portrait Photographers
  • Wedding Photographers
  • Commercial Photographers
  • Anyone who wants skin and hair to look magazine ready

Who should skip

  • Photojournalists who rely on authenticity

✅ Pros

  • Can purchase as a subscription or one-time price
  • Achieves smooth skin without blowing details — even on high contrast portraits.
  • Softens while still providing features to preserve sharpness and texture
  • Gives hair that shampoo commercial look
  • Powerful AI masking makes fill lighting on the face trivial

⛔ Cons

  • Expensive one-time price
  • Still easy to make people look like they belong in the wax museum if you don't use as intended
  • Warmth, Tint, Brightness and Contrast Enhancements are better left for other photo-editing products

Video Review & TutorialπŸŽ₯

If the player doesn’t load here, watch on YouTube.

Before & After

After photo
Before | After Final Before and After taken with a Canon 5D Mark III using a 300mm f/2.8L IS II at f/5.6 for 1/1250sec @ ISO 800

After photo
Before | After New Fill Light feature - On (before) and Off (after)

After photo
Before | After Uniformity Feature - 0 (before) and 40 (after) - pay attention to the shadows by the mouth

After photo
Before | After New Reduce Shine feature - Before (0) and After (40)

After photo
Before | After Get smooth hair with the Hair Mask - Before (Mask hair - 100) vs After (Don't mask hair - 0)

After photo
Before | After Return face texture with Sharpness - Before (0) and After (Max - 40)

Closing Thoughts

Nearly 20 years ago, my mentor insisted that if I wanted the best results for skin softening, I should use Portraiture—and they were absolutely right. Over the years, I’ve spoken with many top‑tier pros working on high‑value projects, and Portraiture was one of their “secret sauce” tools. Meanwhile, countless tutorials claimed you could get the same results manually. What I learned is that Portraiture was always a step ahead—delivering next‑level quality faster and with far less effort. Getting perfect skin in seconds became a no‑brainer.

Fast‑forward to today: at first glance, it may look unchanged, but under the hood it’s faster, smarter, and loaded with improvements in object detection and workflow efficiency. It’s still a world‑class leader—and now it’s better than ever.

Although my review focused on using Portraiture in Photoshop, it performs just as seamlessly in Lightroom Classic.
If you’ve used Portraiture—or tried alternatives—I’d love to hear your experience. What tools are essential in your portrait retouching workflow? Drop your thoughts or questions below!

πŸ‘‰ Click here to learn more

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Nik Collection 9 Mini-Review: What’s New, What Matters, and How to Save 15%

Camera ReviewRonMartBlog

Nik Collection 9 Mini-Review: What’s New, What Matters, and How to Save 15%

If you’ve been around here for a while, you already know that Nik is not just another plugin suite to me.

A long time ago, Nik helped put this blog on the map, and for a while it even helped generate real income for me. Those days are long gone, but I still pay attention when a new Nik Collection drops because this product has been part of my photography and editing journey for a very long time.

Today DxO officially launched Nik Collection 9, and rather than pretend I’ve already done a deep real-world review, I want to do something more useful: give you a practical first look at what’s new, what actually matters, and what I’m most interested in testing first.

Nik Collection 9 Review: What’s New, What Matters, and How to Save 15% product photo

TL;DR ⚡

My early take is that Nik Collection 9 looks less like a minor cosmetic update and more like a meaningful workflow release.

The biggest thing that jumps out at me is not just another creative filter. It’s the smarter masking and selection tools. If those work well in the real world, they could make several of the Nik tools a lot faster and a lot more useful than before.

The more stylized additions also look interesting, but those are the kind of tools that can either be used tastefully or abused very quickly. So for me, the real story here is control, speed, and flexibility.

Nik Collection 9 looks like a genuinely useful upgrade thanks to AI Masks, Depth Masks, and better workflow tools, and if you’re interested you can save 15% with my code at the end of the article.

Table of Contents

  1. Quick Edits Using New Features
  2. Video Overview
  3. What’s New in Nik Collection 9
  4. The Features I Think Matter Most
  5. The More Creative Side
  6. What I Want to Test First
  7. Pricing, availability and discount details
  8. Closing thoughts
  9. Related articles

Quick Edits Using New Features

After photo
Before | After New Color Grading and Levels & Curves Filters

After photo
Before | After Nik 9 AI Object Mask Inverted with B&W Filter

After photo
Before | After Nik 9 Halation with AI Object Mask

After photo
Before | After Nik 9 Depth Filter on Foliage around waterfall

Video Review πŸŽ₯

If the player doesn’t load here, watch on YouTube.

What’s New in Nik Collection 9

DxO added a pretty healthy batch of new tools and workflow improvements in Nik Collection 9. Here’s the short version of what’s new:

  • Depth Masks
  • AI Masks
  • Color Grading in Nik Color Efex
  • Chromatic Shift
  • Glass Effect
  • Halation
  • Blending Modes
  • Workflow improvements and usability refinements

The Features I Think Matter Most

The two biggest additions for practical photographers look like AI Masks and Depth Masks. Those are the kinds of tools that can actually speed up real editing work instead of just giving you another flashy effect to play with for five minutes.

AI Masks should make it easier to isolate subjects quickly without the usual pain of tedious manual selections. That has obvious value for portraits, street photography, travel shots, and anything else where you want to guide the viewer’s eye without spending forever building masks.

Depth Masks also look interesting because they appear to let you target adjustments based on distance from the camera. If that works well in the real world, it could be very useful for landscapes, layered scenes, and images where you want the foreground, midground, and background to feel more intentionally separated.

I’m also very interested in the new Color Grading tool inside Color Efex. That feels like a smart addition because it gives photographers more direct tonal and color control in one of the most popular parts of the Nik suite.

The More Creative Side

f/? for Unknown at Unknown ISO ? [Unknown, Unknown, Unknown, Unknown with Unknown]
New Color Grading Filter in Nik Collection 9

Nik Collection has always had a creative side, and version 9 leans into that with Halation, Chromatic Shift, Glass Effect, and Blending Modes.

Halation is probably the one I’m most interested in because it has the potential to add a subtle cinematic glow around highlights without instantly screaming “cheap effect” if it’s done well. Used with restraint, that could be genuinely useful.

Chromatic Shift and Glass Effect look more stylized, and these are the kinds of tools that can either add a cool analog or experimental vibe or go off the rails fast depending on how heavy-handed you get. In other words, the potential is there, but so is gimmick territory.

Blending Modes may end up being one of the sleeper additions in this release. Advanced users could get a lot of mileage out of having more control over how different effects and filters interact with an image.

What I Want to Test First

f/? for Unknown at Unknown ISO ? [Unknown, Unknown, Unknown, Unknown with Unknown]
Depth Filter in Nik 9 seems very promising

Once I get more time with Nik Collection 9, these are the things I want to test first before drawing any serious conclusions:

  • How good AI Masks really are on difficult subjects like hair, edges, and busy backgrounds
  • Whether Depth Masks feel genuinely useful or just look impressive in a demo
  • Whether Color Grading in Color Efex is fast and intuitive enough to become part of a normal workflow
  • Whether Halation can be used tastefully without turning every image into an overcooked clichΓ©

That should tell me pretty quickly whether this is just a flashy launch or a genuinely useful update for real photographers.

Pricing and availability

  • When: Nik Collection 9 is available now as a perpetual license.
  • How Much: $179.99 for a new license and $99.99 for upgrades from Nik Collection 7 or 8.
  • Discount: YES, 15% off - use code RONMART when placing your order

Closing Thoughts

Nik has a long history, and for a lot of photographers it’s one of those products that carries a little nostalgia along with the actual "must have" functionality.

For me, Nik matters because it was part of the early story of this blog, and because some of the tools in this ecosystem have been genuinely useful for photographers who care more about results than hype.

Nik Collection 9 looks promising at first glance, especially on the masking and control side. I’m cautiously optimistic, and I’ll follow up once I’ve had a chance to put it through a real-world test.

If you’re a longtime Nik user, this looks like a release worth paying attention to.

πŸ‘‰ Click here to learn more