Wednesday, August 8, 2012

REVIEW: Imagenomic Portraiture 2.0 -vs- Nik Software Dynamic Skin Softener

Imagenomic is mostly known for its award winning Noiseware product, but there’s another Imagenomic product that I use all of the time – Portraiture. What this product does is skin softening but in a more subtle yet sophisticated way by automatically detecting the skin surfaces and only applying changes to them.

In addition to the automatic mode you can use an eyedropper tool and take multiple samples to get great one pass skin softening on faces with multiple skin tones (i.e., shadows on face, rosy cheeks, etc…) which is something all of the other products I have used have failed to do in just one pass. Imagenomic handles this very well in a package that looks intimidating the first time you load it up, but it’s 2.0 improvements help you get the hang of how it works quickly so it grows on your fast.

Photo Thoughts – Red Jacket

Haruka-488-Edit-2 - Alternate Crop - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Portraiture is my “go to” skin softening product

Rather than just do a review of Portraiture, I thought it might be fun to add a little user education in it by doing a end to end walkthrough and while I’m discussing how Portraiture and its best competitor – Nik Software’s Dynamic Skin Softener (found in Color Efex) work.

Portraiture –vs– Nik Software’s Dynamic Skin Softener (via Color Efex)


Color Efex Skin Softening User Interface

I’ve been a big fan of Nik Software since 2007 and the first product I purchased from them was Color Efex. Included with this product was their crown jewel filter that many photographers use daily – their Dynamic Skin Softener (DSS)  filter. I used it and loved it for years, but when Portraiture 2.0 came out I started to find myself going to Portraiture more often to get the job done right very quickly.


Portraiture’s User Interface on Windows 7 in 64-bit CS4

Portraiture’s User Interface appears more complex at first, but it is pretty easy once you realize that it automatically does everything so you could just load it and click OK and get pretty good results most of the time. However its power lies in the eye dropper too which goes beyond what Color Efex offers and actually lets you do skin samples as much as you like to pinpoint a range of colors that should be impacted by softening.

While Dynamic Skin Softener (DSS) is a good product and it can be dialed in to get similar softening results, I found the advanced eye dropper and some of the presets in Portraiture to be a big step ahead of what Dynamic Skin Softener can do.

To see what I mean, compare the screen shot above to the shot below (taken from Mac, but both work the same way) and notice the mask preview on the right. By sampling various spots on the image I was able to isolate most of the skin with minimal impact on the rest of the image. The remainder can usually be ignored or masked off with a quick black brush stroke when you return Photoshop, but I usually just leave it alone and most of the time I can isolate my selection to just the skin very quickly.

Nik’s Dynamic Skin Softener (DSS) I would have to use multiple U-Point controls and most likely the brush feature of Color Efex to do the same thing, but when skin tones shift quite a bit I find that I have to do multiple layers and sample each of the major tones separately to get them all done very well. Both products work well, but this is just much faster because I can do it in one quick pass with a few simple clicks.


Portraitures’ User Interface on Mac OS X in 64-bit CS5 with Presets Shown

Portraiture offers some handy presets (shown above) that speed up productivity as well as options for enhancing the skin tones (can be disabled).

The Nik alternative offers some sliders to control the level of softening, and U-Point controls allow you to disable softening in places. Finally Color Efex only has user-definable presets (called Quick Save slots), so you don’t get anything built-in to speed up your workflow.

Seasoned DSS veterans like me can use both products equally effective, but I still have found that the default settings in Portraiture are better to my personal preferences. This coupled with the fact that I can make fast adjustments in one pass means I get a a time advantage in my image processing my workflow that make it worth it the switch.

DSS vs Portraiture Comparison

Here’s an image that shows what the skin looks like after the skin softening with Nik Software’s Color Efex Dynamic Skin Softening, and when you hover over it you can see the same image processed with Portraiture. Click the links in the caption for larger versions:


Dynamic Skin Softener – click here for larger


Portraiture -
click here for larger

Both products create good results, but I find that DSS is a little more aggressive by default. Both products allow for adjustments so this can be addressed in the user-interface or by simply changing the opacity of the skin softening layer, but I find the defaults in Portraiture more suitable to my tastes.

This example for Portraiture uses color enhancements, but this can easily be disabled by clicking off in the Enhancements panel shown in the screen shots above. I used it because it saved me a processing step, but others may wish to do that in Photoshop or Lightroom directly.

Skin Softening is Subjective

Just like with noise reduction, how much skin softening you apply is very subjective. One user might want the porcelain/plastic look and the other may only want a faint hint. I’m in between, but I lean more to the softer side. If you flip through fashion magazines you’ll notice that the industry practice is definitely a lot of softening, but artificial texture is usually added after the fact to give it more of a realistic appearance.

My advice here is do what you like. You are the photographer, and your work is a reflection of you so do what you like the most.  Top Photographers like Jill Greenberg have made a name for themselves by doing unrealistic skin enhancements, so while some people might complain about your level of skin softening (as they do with Jill) others will call it your style (as they also do with Jill).

Don’t let the naysayers scare you. <g>

Other Changes to this Photo

Once I had my skin softening done then I selected the teeth using the quick selection tool, created a Hue/Saturation adjustment layer to adjust the teeth color. I removed a little saturation from the yellow channel and added a little lightness on the master channel. I learned this trick and others I used on this photo from Scott Kelby.  You can read a bunch of tricks like these in his book The Adobe Photoshop CS5 Book for Digital Photographers.

The next thing that needed to be fixed were the eyes. I made a selection on the eyes and did a quick high pass filter on them (around 24), then I changed the layer to use the overlay blending mode and then masked out whatever I didn’t want modified. Once again this was a Kelby trick discussed on his PhotoshopUser TV show but similar techniques are done in the book above too.

My last steps to this image were a little dodge and burn on the eyes, a visit to the warp tool to narrow the face, and I used the digital reflector filter in Color Efex to add some additional light and color to the face. I sharpened the final product with Sharpener Pro.


Before


After

Conclusion

I’ve had Portraiture for a long time, including the first version. At first I didn’t use it much because I was set in my ways with Color Efex. I just didn’t see the point. However, one of my mentors who was a die hard Dynamic Skin Softener fan (his only reason for owning Color Efex) picked it up and ranted about how much better it was. This got me to take a closer look and I quickly discovered that there is indeed much more than you can do much faster with Portraiture than you can with Nik’s Dynamic Skin Softener.

The biggest and best advantage is the fact that I no longer have to do multiple skin softening layers when the skin tones differ on the face (i.e., hot faces with rosy cheeks, shadows like on the neck above, birth marks, etc…), which was a big hassle in my previous workflow – especially if you are using the Aperture or Lightroom versions as you’ll need to make multiple passes which can be painfully slow with lots of TIF files created in Color Efex.

My overall advice is that if you are doing a lot of people work and you like skin softening, then Portraiture is a must own (which is why it is high on my What Plug-ins Should I Buy? list). If you just do a casual amount and own Color Efex then you can probably live without it. Both products are WAY better than using Photoshop’s Blur filter or Lightroom’s negative Clarity trick as both methods require a lot of complex painting that is very time consuming and I’ve never been as happy with the results.

If you enjoyed this article, you’ll love this:

TUTORIAL: Using Portraiture 2.3 by Imagenomic (Discount Offer)

Special Offer – Save 15% on ALL Imagenomic Products!!!

Imagenomic Shopping Cart with Discount Applied

Imagenomic is offering readers of this blog 15% off ALL of their products including their bundle. Click here and use the code RONMART2012 to get your 15% discount. See the screen shot above (click for a larger version) to see where and how to enter the code.

Always consult the Discount Coupon Code page if the offer links or code here do not work for any shown. Offer subject to change without notice.

Lightroom and Aperture support is available for an extra fee or sold separately.

Disclaimer

I was provided evaluation copies of the products mentioned in this article (except Color Efex – I paid for that). I may get a commission if you make a purchase using the links and codes featured in this article. Thank you for supporting this blog by using the links and code provided when making your purchase.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by donating a dollar or saving several dollars by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

Click here to learn more about how this blog is funded.

9 comments:

Greg said...

This guy really knows what he is doing! I bought this plug in and can not believe how much time it saves and how great the portrait photos turn out. Also, the instruction video is superb. If nothing else, try the free trial version first.

Russell said...

Hi Ron:

Have you compared Portrait Professional yet?

Thanks so much,

Russ

Ron Martinsen said...

Yes, I have. I'll be posting the results in an article soon.

I still prefer portraiture, but for those getting started they may find some of the other things that Portrait Professional can do to be a welcome addition to their workflow.

A good analogy is that Portrait Professional is much like P mode on the camera - it helps to do a lot of things automatically, which is great when you get started. Once you know what you are doing you rarely go there and find other modes like Aperture Priority to be superior. Portraiture is part of a more advanced workflow like Aperture Priority on our cameras.

pechersky said...

I've just started using Portraiture and must say it's great - the thing I like the most about it is that it create a soft-yet-full-of-small-details look.

Here are my examples:
http://500px.com/photo/1989711
http://500px.com/photo/1989694

(and these are the first images that I did with Portraiture - I expect even better results once I master it more)

Anonymous said...

Two thumbs-up for the in-depth comparision.

Yasser

bassem said...

Hey, i just use imagenomic portraiture and i have a question:
How can after i used imagenomic to remove the scales that it's seen on the picture.. thanks a lot

bassem said...

Hey,
I just use Imagenomic Portraiture.. it's relly wonderfull..
But i have a question: after using the imagenomic on any picture, scales are seen on them how can i remove this lines..

thanks a lot

Ron Martinsen said...

Not sure what you mean by scales. There are different skin softening modes and in Photoshop you can lower the opacity of the effect if you choose a value that is too strong for your taste

Ron Martinsen said...

Are you using a trial version? If so then you can remove them by purchasing the product.