I liked the Canon 5Ds a lot more than I expected to when I first reviewed it, but I had that burning question that every 5Ds user has – is the 5DsR better? Fundamentally the two cameras are identical with one major exception – the 5DsR removes the optical low pass filter which in theory means you should get much sharper images as the risk of possible moiré pattern issues under certain circumstances. In my testing of other cameras without the low pass filter like the Nikon D810 and Sony Alpha A7R, I have never had any issues so I figured the extremely hard to find 5DsR was going to be awesome. In fact, the early preview I got of it at WPPI suggested it would be excellent.
Rather than repeat everything for the identical body found on the 5Ds, I’d encourage you to read my 5Ds review. This article will focus primarily on image samples and observations while shooting with this camera. Part II will focus on differences between the models.
Real World Samples
The following images come straight from in-camera JPEG’s using the camera default noise reduction settings. Most camera settings are the default with the exception of RAW+JPEG, a desired White Balance (only Shade or AWB), and a desired focus point. I chose to use the Standard Picture Style for all except for the California coast shots (I used Landscape) and where noted.
Click here for a full gallery of unedited images.
All images are copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may not save, print, edit, modify or otherwise use any images featured in this article or the gallery without expressed written permission.
f/4 @ 102mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 125 using 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
Notice the detail in Mackelmore’s earpiece and Ray-Ban logo!
f/4 @ 105mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 200
It’s hard to get a sharp shot with a long lens and a high megapixel camera, but when your subject cooperates the result is some pretty impressive detail (at full size) and a pleasing bokeh even at f/4
f/4 @ 115mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 160
The tough part about shooting at concerts is the inevitable distractions that end up in the frame, but there are so many megapixels that if you pull off a sharp shot like this one of Wanz you can still have a nice size file when you eliminate the distractions as shown above
(click the image for the uncropped original)
f/5.6 @ 30mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 100 using the 24-70mm f/2.8L II
The detail in this shot illustrates why this camera is a landscape shooters dream
f/7.1 @ 44mm for 1/320 sec at ISO 200
Again, details galore make this a fun camera to capture the details of the California West Coast
f/5.6 @ 44mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 100
With good dynamic range, sharp foreground detail and smooth out of focus regions, this is an ideal camera for capturing scenes where you want the context of the background but the sharpness of the foreground to jump out at you. In this respect, this camera and the 5Ds don’t disappoint!
f/5.6 @ 70mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 100
Backlit subjects on a sunny day is a scenario where lesser cameras meters fail miserably, but in this case I got what I’d call typical Canon results. While some fill flash or exposure compensation (in-camera or in post-processing) would have helped, this was a reasonable starting point for tough conditions on a very sunny day
f/4 @ 70mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 160
Afraid of photographing bees? 50 Megapixels means you can shoot from a comfortable distance like this and crop to get your desired result yet still have a large file for printing
f/5.6 @ 70mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 100
In super bright sun my handheld landscape shots had pretty good detail even out in the distance like you can see here, but as the shutter speeds dropped below 3x to 5x the reciprocal of the focal length later in the day the background got super soft
f/5.6 @ 24mm for 1/250 sec at ISO 125
I was pleased with the detail in the shadows and color in this tough backlit shot
f/4 @ 70mm for 1/400 sec at ISO 320
I took about 10 of these shots, but only one came out this sharp. It was clear that 1/400 sec wasn’t nearly fast enough for even for the minimalistic movements of a bag piper
f/22 @ 47mm for 1/400 sec at ISO 6400
Toss in some diffraction, the softest aperture for this lens, and high ISO and you end up with a shot that’s pretty useless for anything but small images on social media.
f/7.1 @ 70mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 400
I found myself fearing to go beyond f/7.1 with this camera and lens combo as I was often disappointed when I went to a larger f-stop number or ISO than what you see here. Notice the detail and dynamic range improvements of this shot over the one above though!
f/4 @ 61mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 400
Sunset was a joy with this camera as it captures a nice tonal range of greens on the course
f/5.6 @ 33mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 100
This is a fun shot to pixel peep at full size to see all of the detail it captures from this one man band setup on the pier in San Francisco
f/5.6 @ 70mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 160
My focus point for this shot was the boat which meant the shallow depth of field didn’t leave me with a sharp shot of the flock of pelicans in the scene. I suspect I would have got a much better result for the birds with a 5D Mark III but at the expense of the detail of Alcatraz in the background.
f/5.6 @ 41mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 125
There were a lot of things going on in this shot, but I thought the wide dynamic range really showed its value in the dark areas
Click here for a full gallery of unedited images.
All images are copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may not save, print, edit, modify or otherwise use any images featured in this article or the gallery without expressed written permission.
AF Microadjustment Required?
One of my readers who read my 5Ds article posted on social media that she had to make a significant AF Microadjustment for each of her lenses when using the 5DsR. I didn’t see this issue with the 5Ds, but I decided to double check with the 5DsR unit that I received for testing. As you can see below a slight adjustment was required for my 24-70mm lens to correct some forward focusing issues but it wasn’t extreme from what I could see using my SpyderLensCal:
100% view of Datacolor SpyderLensCal Autofocus Calibration Aid
If you are seeing the problem my reader described which is more significant than what I see here, then please feel free to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that I have to approve comment due to spambot attacks, so you only need to comment once – it may be a few days before the comment is approved as I have to filter out the noise from the valid comments.
The 50 Megapixel Advantage
I strongly encourage you to read my 5Ds review (especially part II) where I show the value of 50 megapixels even when you are downsizing to web size images, but here’s another well-known practical use of 50 megapixels – cropping.
In this particular case I was walking along the beach in California with my family when my 16 year old son, Taylor, spotted what he claimed to be a whale breaching. It was so far out that I couldn’t really see it and I thought he was mistaken. Using the only lens I had – the 24-70mm f/2.8L, I decided to take a shot to see what was really out there. Here’s one of the frames that I got:
f/7.1 @ 70mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 100 using the 24-70mm f/2.8L II
I couldn’t see anything, but when I zoomed in on my LCD it became clear he was right as you can see below (slightly enhanced via the raw original in Lightroom):
100% crop of the whale in the shot above
This reminded me of what my wildlife friends tell me they love about high megapixel cameras – the extra reach via cropping! Well, this definitely illustrates this point even if this is a rather extreme case – and the value of good light (to freeze your subject at a low ISO).
Conclusion
Click here to see my conclusion in part II.
If you haven’t done so already, please read my 5Ds review.
Where to order
Click here to learn more or order on the 5Ds or 5Ds R on the B&H web site.
Other articles you may enjoy
If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these articles about other Canon products:
- 5DsR Review Part II
- REVIEW: Canon 5Ds (Part I of II) with Unedited Sample Photos
- REVIEW: Canon 5Ds–Should You Upgrade?(Part II of II)
- Canon 600EX-RT Flash First Look (ST-E3 RT)
- Canon 40mm f/2.8 STM Pancake Lens
- Canon 8-15mm f/4L Fisheye Zoom
- Canon 11-24mm f/4L
- Canon 16-35mm f/4L vs 16-35mm f/2.8L II
- Canon 24-70 f/2.8L II (vs 24-70 f/4L IS Comparison)
- Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM First Look
- Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS vs 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 DO
- Canon 100-400m f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM (NEW)
- Canon 200-400mm f/4L IS with 1.4X Extender
- Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS II at the Zoo
- Canon G16 vs s120 & Fujifilm X20
- Canon iPF6400/6450 vs iPF6300/6350 Comparison
- Canon PRO-1 Printer (PRO-10 Comparison)
- Canon SX-80 Pro Photography Projector
Here’s also some other articles on this blog that you might enjoy:
- NEC PA322UHD 4k for Pro Photo & Video Editing
- NEC EA244UHD 4k Display
- NEC PA242W Monitor Review – 1920x1200
- NEC PA302W Monitor Review – 1920x1200
- NEC SpectraSensor Pro (powered by X-Rite)
- Nikon D4s (D4)
- Nikon D610 (D600 vs Canon)
- Nikon D750 - Yeah, you want this one!
- Nikon D810 (includes SIGMA 50mm Art & Otus 55mm)
- Nikon D7200 (and older model links)
- SIGMA 120-300mm
- SIGMA 24mm Art Series
- SIGMA 35mm Art Series
- SIGMA 50mm f/1.4 Art Series (includes comparisons)
- SIGMA USB Dock
- Sony a7R
- Tripod & Ball Head Recommendations
- Zeiss Otus 55m f/1.4
- Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4
- Ron’s Recommendations
- Discount Coupon Codes
- HOW TO: Drastically Improve Your Handheld Shot
Disclosure
If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.
No comments:
Post a Comment