Showing posts with label G15. Show all posts
Showing posts with label G15. Show all posts

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Adorama Black Friday Deals (Expire Dec 2 at 11:59 PM EST)

Canon G15 - save $150


Reg $449.00 Sale Price $299.00


This offer expires on December 2nd at 11:59 PM

Nikon D800 Digital SLR Camera Body, USA - Special Promotional Bundle


Regular $3396.95 Sale $3196.95 Free Shipping


This offer expires on 12/03/2013

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Zoom Lens


Reg $2289.00 Price After MIR Price $1799.00 Free Shipping


This offer expires on 12/03/2013

Asus Taichi Full HD IPS 11.6" Touchscreen i5-3317U 1.7GHz, 4GB DDR3 RAM, 128GB SSD, Windows 8


Regular Price $899.99 Sale Price $699.99 Free Shipping


This offer expires on 12/02/2013

Nikon Black Friday Deals


Big buy together and save deals on all Nikons including the D800E

Canon Mail in Rebates


Lots of bundle deals and mail in rebates


This offer expires on December 28th, 2013

Fujifilm Black Friday Specials Page


See link for details


This offer expires on Monday at 11:59 PM EST

Asus Taichi Full HD IPS 11.6" Touchscreen i7-3517U 1.9GHz, 4GB DDR3 RAM, 256G SSD, Windows 8


Regular Price $1189.00 Sale Price $899.99 Free Shipping


This offer expires on 12/02/2013

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

    Disclosure

    If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

    Monday, January 28, 2013

    Sony DSC-RX100 vs Fujifilm X10 vs Canon s110/G15(Review Part 2 of 2)

    Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-RX100 Rear View
    Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-RX100 Rear View

    In part 1 of my review of the Sony DSC-RX100 (click to read), I showed lots of real world photos which show off the strengths of this camera. Its compact size and solid image quality make it compelling, but in this article I’ll wrap things up with a discussion about how it compares to some of the competition. In my mind, the cameras that most closely compete with this camera are the Fujifilm x10 (my former point and shoot of the year), the Canon s110 (which offers similar features in a compact package) and the highly touted Canon G15.

    Bookshelf Test

    Bookshelf images of different ISO’s and additional settings can be found at http://www.ronmartinsen.com/sony/rx100. Be sure to look at the filenames and metadata for details about what is what, and you may download them for your personal review but please delete them when you are done. All images were taken with RAW+JPEG Fine and camera defaults, but I can only upload JPEG so that’s what’s included online. I did disable stabilization for these tests since I was using a tripod and long exposures.

    Here’s the base native ISO image (which is 125, not 100 or 200 as you’d find in other cameras):


    Sony DSC-RX100 - f/8 @ 10.4 mm,10s, ISO 125, No Flash, AWB

    From the in-camera JPEG with zero post-processing, what I see is an image that has excellent color, white balance and tasteful saturation. The image is sharp and overall fairly impressive for the size of its sensor.

    For the opposite end of the spectrum, the ISO 6400 image always underexposed no matter what metering mode I was in and even with various ISO modes and both Aperture Priority and Manual (when set to +/-0 EV). Here’s the result:


    RX100 f/8 @ 10.4 mm,1/8, ISO 6400, No Flash, AWB

    The noise was squashed to oblivion which kills too much detail so overall I felt like this was an unusable ISO. For kicks and giggles I took the same exact image from the RAW file and just accepted the default RAW processing of Lightroom 4.3 (plus I clicked Auto Exposure) and this is what it looked like:


    Same as above, but from Lightroom RAW Processing and Auto Exposure

    The detail returns but so does the noise, so make no mistake that this is still a tiny sensor point and shoot. Noise is a reality but if you take a less ridiculous noise reduction setting (say Noiseware Default setting) then you have an image that cleans up nice enough to use for small prints and online images as shown here:


    Same as above, but Noiseware Default noise reduction applied

    DRO vs HDR

    I also decided to test DRO vs HDR more carefully to see if my handheld results in the previous article would still hold up. As one might expect, they did but I did also confirm using longer exposures that HDR does in fact take multiple exposures as one would expect. In my previous article I stated I wasn’t sure that it did because the exposures were taken so quickly and so close together that I didn’t hear them. As a result I thought it might have been doing in-camera HDR from a single exposure, but that doesn’t appear to be the case (thankfully).

    Here’s the Auto DRO setting which appeared to be the same as the DRO 5 setting done manually:


    f/8 @ 10.4 mm,10s, ISO 125, No Flash, AWB, DRO Auto

    There wasn’t any major difference in this mode versus the non DRO image, so I was a bit disappointed in the result. However, the HDR was quite nice and Auto seemed to take 3 or 4 exposures (I heard 4 clicks but wasn’t sure if all 4 were exposures) in the HDR Auto & HDR 6EV modes. Here’s the result:


    f/8 @ 10.4 mm,10s, ISO 125, No Flash, AWB, HDR Auto

    As I saw with the handheld, the alignment was great and the range was very good. It still was less than I am accustomed to getting from the EXR mode of the X10, but it was way better than the s110 HDR mode. If you have the this camera and the time to use, the HDR mode is definitely worthwhile for a great dynamic range with excellent color.

    Subjective Comparison

    Unfortunately I do not have any direct bookshelf images to compare against RX100 as my methodology for testing is much different now than it was at the time I reviewed the other cameras in this class. I didn’t take cameras in this class seriously in the past so my other bookshelf tests were more informal and not framed and tested to the same standard as I do for mirrorless and DSLR’s now.

    With that said, I did test the RX100 using the more advanced methodology so that I can compare it against future cameras and you can compare it with other more expensive cameras that I have reviewed. This should come in handy when I review the X20 and the RX100 replacement in the future (no, I have no idea when or if that will ever happen).

    To see the galleries of the other cameras discussed in this review then visit the following hyperlinks:

    Based on my subjective opinion, here’s how I am seeing how these cameras compare:

    1. At lower ISO’s, the best overall image quality favors the RX100
    2. It’s my opinion, that the RX100 seems to have the sharpest lens of the bunch
    3. In-camera noise reduction on the RX100 is terrible and gets horrific after ISO 800
    4. The in-camera meter likes to underexpose compared to the others and switching metering modes didn’t help in the bookshelf test. Despite indicating a proper exposure, the ISO6400 shot was very underexposed. None of the other cameras exhibited this issue.
    5. The RX100 and s110 are nearly identical in design, but the s110 is more feature rich and easier to use.
    6. While none of these cameras have great flashes, I preferred the RX100’s flash performance the most.
    7. The RX100 LCD was the hardest to use outdoors, but its battery performance was the best so perhaps that was an intentional trade-off by Sony.
    8. Ease of use wise, I still prefer the Canon G-series (especially the G12) over the RX100
    9. Camera that frustrated me the most in the field – RX100
    10. Camera my wife most enjoyed – X10, but she loved the one hand ease-of-use of the RX100.
    11. Best mixed-light camera (i.e., drastic differences between foreground & background) – Fujifilm EXR mode found on the x10. DRO and even the HDR performance of the RX100 wasn’t even close
    12. Best macro camera – x10
    13. Best pano performance – RX100
    14. Best video – RX100
    15. Best stabilization – RX100
    16. Best in-camera high ISO performance – s110
    17. Best value – s110
    18. Worst value – RX100 (overpriced IMHO for what you get)
    19. If I could only have one – Fujifilm x10 (because of EXR mode)
    20. If advising a friend, I’d still suggest the x10 but if size is an issue I’d say the s110 or RX100

    Here’s also some other cameras I’ve reviewed that some may wish to compare against as well (but I don’t consider any of these to be direct competitors):

    Conclusion

    I like the RX100 and feel like it makes great images. If you do a comparison of the RAW images you’ll quickly find that it has great RAW images that are hampered by fairly poor in-camera processing compared to the other cameras I’ve tested. At low ISO’s it’s not an issue and they are quite good, but as the ISO’s climb the poor in-camera noise reduction really hurts. As a result, my “always keep your raw images” applies more for this camera than any of the others I’ve tested.

    I wanted the RX100 to be a small sensor RX1 with a zoom, but it’s not. I wanted it to have NEX-7 like performance and Canon s110 like ease of use – but it doesn’t have that either. Instead what you get is a nice s110 size camera with an excellent lens, great low ISO performance, above average battery life and great video. All of those things make it a compelling camera that I think will satisfy buyers who live in the automatic modes, but anyone who likes control over their camera will find that the RX100 comes up short – very short. Given the high price of this camera, that’s unacceptable, but hopefully enough people will ignore these realities and buy it anyway so that Sony will be encourage to release a new model that hopefully addresses some of my concerns.

    If you are a RAW only shooter then you’ll be much more satisfied than if you are someone who likes to use the JPEG whenever possible and the RAW is only a backup (which is my preference for cameras in this class). As a result, all of these little issues and the price have caused me to pass on getting the RX100 (which I had intended to buy before I tested it) and stick with my X10. It looks like my hope for a replacement now will rest on the X20 which I hope to review soon.

    Where to order

    Click here to order the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 on the B&H web site. My friends at Adorama have it available here and Amazon has it available here.

    Other articles you may enjoy

    If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

    Disclosure

    If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this. B&H loaned me the camera I used for this review.

    Wednesday, November 14, 2012

    PowerShot Comparison: Canon G12 vs G15 vs s110–Part II

    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12 Front View
    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12

    In my previous article, I began my observations of the difference between the new G15 over the G12 and G1X as well as the s110. In this article I just focus a bit on image quality using my well-known bookshelf test and a couple portrait photos taken by both the s110 and G15.

    Portraits

    I only had a short time to shoot a small set of portraits with this camera this weekend, but the following were done in natural light on a very gloomy and rainy day in Seattle. The images chosen were the sharpest (not necessarily the best photos) of the handheld images taken. Honestly, even under these decent conditions I really struggled to get a sharp shot. Both cameras ended up going to ISO 800 (both set to Auto ISO and Av to the minimum f/stop number for the focal length shown).

    Both images are untouched in-camera JPEG originals with camera default settings shot in Aperture Priority at the minimum aperture for the zoom level chosen. Blurry shots are omitted.


    s110 f4, 1/25 sec ISO 800 at 11.934mm focal length, Auto White Balance (AWB)
    Click for Full-Size Original In-Camera Image

    The s110 has a wider angle lens and it quickly felt like I was getting in the models personal bubble when I tried to shoot at f/2, so I settled on f/4 and the 12mm focal length. Of all my handheld test shots, this was the sharpest but I was a bit disappointed with the indoor performance.


    G15, f/2.8, 1/40 sec ISO 800 at 30.5mm focal length, AWB
    Click for Full-Size Original In-Camera Image

    The G15 isn’t as wide as the s11, but it’s aperture range is more helpful indoors. The brighter lens of the G15 allowed me to zoom in more and use faster shutter speeds to get the shot. Overall the G15 was definitely easier to use indoors under these conditions (which are a dream for a DSLR shooter).

    While I still had my share of blurry shots from the G15, I was still pleased with what this camera had to offer under these tough conditions when photographing people. Neither of these shots are going to win awards, but the image quality was decent for a point and shoot.

    For those who are wondering, my subjective opinion of the much heavier G1X is that definitely does a better job at shots like this (especially at ISO 800), but I’d still prefer my X10 in conditions like this over all the Canon models.

    Bookshelf Test

    Click for 100% Zoom Image
    Close examination of the text “Her Family” showed that the G15 had a pretty clear advantage at detail preservation at higher ISO’s over the s110

    You can see more images and pixel peep to your heart content at the following galleries:

    My high level subjective observations were as follows:

    • The s110 lens outperforms the G15 when wide open (f/2 and f/1.8 respectively), but at f/4 the G12 appears to be sharper than the s110.
    • ISO performance has improved over the G12 for both the G15 and s110, but the G15 as a slight edge at higher ISO’s.
    • Both the G15 and the s110 outperform the G12 at higher ISO’s, but it’s also clear that they use a more aggressive noise reduction algorithm that doesn’t seem as good at preserving detail as what you’d find in Noiseware or Dfine. As a result, I’d probably not exceed ISO 1600 on the new cameras (which is equivalent to ISO 800 on the G12).
    • The dynamic range of the s110 seems to be the best, even though I expected them to be identical.
    • Overall none of the Canon point and shoots are high ISO top performers, so don’t count on these cameras for your low light shooting needs.

    Conclusion

    There was less image quality progress made on this generation of camera updates than I expected. That’s a shame too because Canon used to be a trusted name for compact cameras, but there’s so many competitors like Fuji and Nikon that are really trying to up their game. As a result I’d give them a mediocre image quality rating, but the s110 has such great portability that it might make it worth while to sacrifice some image quality.

    If a friend asked me on the street what point and shoot they should get, I’d still say the Fujifilm X10. If they said, what Canon should they get I’d say I’ve switched camp from the G series that I loved in the past and now favor the smaller s110.

    s series camera owners have a lot of reasons to justify an upgrade, but G series owners should stay put. I wouldn’t tell them to rush out and buy a G1X either as I think that camera is just too big and bulky without the benefit of significantly better image quality.

    Where to Buy

    B&H loaned me the gear for this article, so I suggest you show them your appreciation by placing your order for a s110 or G15 with them. Click here to order the s110 or click here to order the G15.

    Adorama has a kit version of the G15 and a kit version of the black s110 as well as a kit of the white s110.

    Other Articles You Might Enjoy

    Disclosure

    B&H loaned me the new gear for this article but the G12 was my personal camera that I paid full price for myself. If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission.

    Friday, November 9, 2012

    PowerShot Comparison: Canon G12 vs G15 vs s110

    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12 Front View
    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12

    For years I’ve been a fan of the Canon G-series camera and have had reviews on my blog for every version since the G9, but when the s90 came on the scene many Canon faith jumped ship to the smaller and more compact cousin to the G series. I wasn’t impressed with the S series cameras despite their great form factor, so I’ve shunned them in the past. Read on to see why I’ve started to have a change of heart and why my G12 is going up for sale!

    Oh, and in case you are wondering there was no G13 or G14 for superstition reasons.

    What’s New and What’s Different

    Mouse over to see before, mouse out to see after
    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12 Rear View

    The s110 and G15 get upgraded to feature the latest LCD’s and image processors from Canon to give you the best image quality that Canon has offered to date on this series camera. You can learn more about the s110 here and the G15 here on Canon’s website. This article will instead focus on some of my observations as a long-term G series owner and a previous s95 and s100 user. I’ll drill into these details in the following sections.

    To help illustrate the high-level differences I’ve take some shots that show these cameras side by side. Sadly, I didn’t have a s100 to include in the mix, but you can visualize how much more compact the G15’s become and how smaller still the s110 remains over its sibling.

    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12 Overhead View
    Canon PowerShot s110, G15 and G12 Overhead View

    G15 vs G12 & G1x

    During my testing I actually found the G15 to be much closer to the closer to G1X than it was to the G12 in terms of ergonomics. Fortunately the G15 is much thinner thanks in part to its lack of an articulating LCD that I enjoyed on both the G12 and G1X. Of course the advantage to removing this feature is that it not only makes the camera thinner, it also allowed for a much larger display (3.0 vs 2.8 on the G12). To that end, the rear LCD goes up to 922,000 pixels vs only 461,000 on the G12 so it’s a substantial improvement in image quality. The G1X is on paper the same size and pixel density but for some reason the G15 just feels bigger to me. All said though, I really enjoyed the ability to protect the LCD and move the LCD around with the G12/G1X design, so I’m disappointed to see that feature go away. 

    You can see from the pictures what the major differences are so I won’t rehash hall of them here, except to say that I miss the rotating ISO knob up top. However, the addition of a record button is a nice improvement but I’m bummed about losing quick access to the timer as well. For those of you who have a pocket tripod and do macro work with the G series, this is definitely a much less user-friendly macro camera due to the LCD and button changes.

    The only other change worth mentioning is the move from a fixed to a popup flash. It’s good that its farther from the lens, but bad because its now a mechanical part that makes it easier to break. This design consistent with other cameras in this class, so I’m not losing much sleep over this one – it’s still painful using the built-in flash, so the hot shoe with a 270EX II or 320EX is your best bet if you use a flash frequently. Fortunately the higher ISO range and performance of the G15 reduces the need to use the flash as often as was required on the G12.

    Functionality-wise I found the G12 and G15 to be mostly the same with the biggest feature difference being the Full HD (1920x1080) support added to the G15 and the max ISO jumping from 3200 to 12,800.

    s110 vs G15

    As I mentioned, I didn’t have a s100 to compare against, so I can only draw from what I have on hand. The biggest differences between the two begin with the obvious – there’s a lot more physical buttons on the G15 which makes it faster to adjust the controls. However, the s110 does add a jog wheel to its lens which gives you quick access to some additional features (which one depends on the role you set for that control). It still features the tiny battery that dies too quickly, and all of its electronic do-dads like Wi-Fi support only serve to drain it even faster than ever. This unit does feel better in my hands than prior s series, and it’s the first defect free s series camera I’ve used for the entire review period (all previous models had some serious issue by the end of the review).

    The big WOW feature of the s110 has to be its touch screen which really helps it to overcome its lack of buttons. The ability to touch and focus like an iPhone is awesome and really makes it easier and faster to use than a G15 which oddly enough does not have this super helpful feature.

    In the past the s series has always been able to boast the advantage of having a faster lens, but for this generation Canon stepped up and gave the G15 a f/1.8 lens that maxes out at 2.8 when zoomed to 30.5mm as opposed to the f/2.0 lens that maxes out to 5.9 at 26mm on the s110. This is a significant shift from the past and definitely gives a big advantage to the G series – especially in low-light zoom conditions.

    I’ve always loved the form factor the s series cameras, but I’ve been disappointed by its usability. However, the G series has lost enough features and the s series has gained enough “exclusive to the s” features (like Wi-Fi) that the gap between them isn’t as tremendous as it once used to be.

    Wi-Fi vs Eye-Fi

    The addition of integrated Wi-Fi support on s110 was pretty exciting when I first started to review it. Once setup (which is still a bit of a geek experience – even with WPS), it became even more obvious how this is so much more than Eye-Fi. What you end up with is a device on your network that you can pair with your phone, printer, computer and more for an integrated wireless experience. Here’s an example of how my iPhone 5 would see my photos despite the fact that there were no cables between them and the files were still in my camera:

    Thanks to this feature you can leverage your phone’s GPS for doing GeoTagging:

    I could integrate with Canon’s software on my computer to wirelessly transfer the files to the computer:

    Or I could see my device on the network in Lightroom and import files directly with no wires or drive letter assigned (at least on Windows 7):

    Overall I was impressed, but then in practice I ended up being disappointed with the performance and ultimately rolling back to Eye-Fi. Eye-Fi seemed to be less of a drain on the batteries and do everything I need without the headache of the camera being locked for certain operations or having to re-pair the camera to the target device. While I liked this feature more than I expected, I’d say it’s only meaningful for those who don’t have an Eye-Fi yet. If you do, I think you’ll still prefer your Eye-Fi (Pro or greater so you can transfer RAW).

    Real World Sample Images

    100% Crop of a G15 Flower Shot
    100% Crop of a G15 Flower Shot
    ISO 80, straight out of camera with zero modifications

    I should note that these images were taken with the camera default settings which include noise reduction which find to be horribly over aggressive. Setting in-camera noise reduction off or reducing it to Low and then using a product like Noiseware or DFine will give you much better results. Naturally processing from the RAW is even better, but to avoid human error and additional software variables, I use the in-camera JPEG’s for all of my reviews. In practice, I use the RAW’s.

    Here’s a link to the G15 gallery, and here’s a few images you’ll find there (originals in the gallery):


    ISO 80, straight out of camera with zero modifications


    f/4 ISO 100 – I’m impressed – feels like G1X caliber images


    f/2 at 1/80 sec ISO 400 – gotta love the P&S depth of field for macros!


    ISO 1600 is much improved!


    ISO 4000 is destroyed by horrible in-camera noise reduction
    For kicks and giggles, go compare this to a similar image at ISO 5000 in my D600 review <g>

    Here’s a link to the s110 gallery, and here’s a couple images you’ll find there (originals in the gallery):


    f/2 ISO 200 – wow – insane depth of field due to the tiny sensor


    ISO 10,000 is usable

    NOTE: Some images were at ISO 10,000 due to an accidental ISO change in-camera that I’m still not sure how it happened – especially given how ISO is buried on this camera.

    I still have to do my infamous (or dreaded – ha, ha) bookshelf test with all three cameras, and I hope to get more exciting images with these cameras this weekend.

    Conclusion

    For the Canon faithful I’ll draw some lines in the sand here. For starters, the s110 is much improved over the s95 that I reviewed back when the G12 came out. The touch screen helps it to overcome some of my past gripes, and the Wi-Fi support plus big rear display really up its value beyond just being compact. As a result, I feel a lot more comfortable recommending the s110 as a nice pocketable point and shoot.

    The G15 on the other hand has made good progress getting smaller, but I honestly think it’s lost some of the things that made the G12 so great in the process. While it is smaller and lighter, I still don’t think people will consider it any more pocketable (and truth be told if you can fit a G15 in your pocket, you most likely can a G12 too – both fit in my back jeans pocket). It’s also disappointing to not see some of the s110’s features on the G15 which make it feel a bit dated by comparison.

    At the end of the day, I still prefer my Fujifilm X10 as my every day point and shoot camera, and I see little value in upgrading it over G12. However, if you are in the market for a camera of this class I think a great deal on a used G12 is a better investment than the G15. Sure, there’s some image quality improvements in the G15, but not enough to warrant the price difference and not really enough to compete with superior cameras like the Sony NEX-7, Fujifilm X10, and the host of micro four thirds in the compact class. As a result, I’d say if you had to pick then go with the s110 or go outside the Canon brand for a camera that offers more bang for the buck. The G15 is just too overpriced for what you can get elsewhere these days.

    Where to Buy

    B&H loaned me the gear for this article, so I suggest you show them your appreciation by placing your order for a s110 or G15 with them. Click here to order the s110 or click here to order the G15.

    Adorama has a kit version of the G15 and a kit version of the black s110 as well as a kit of the white s110.

    Other Articles You Might Enjoy

    Disclosure

    B&H loaned me the new gear for this article but the G12 was my personal camera that I paid full price for myself. If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission.