Showing posts with label X100. Show all posts
Showing posts with label X100. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Thoughts on the new Fujifilm X100T, X-T1 Graphite & More announcements

Ok, I’ll admit it – I’m a bit of a Fujifilm fan boy because I’ve had quite a bit of enjoyment out of reviewing and owning X-series cameras. As a result, I get excited to hear about what’s new when new models are released. Amidst all the hoopla around the iPhone 6 announcement, I almost missed this one!

Fujifilm X100T Digital Camera
Fujifilm X100T Digital Camera

The Fujifilm X100s is a very good camera that I enjoyed reviewing quite a bit. I was very surprised when I had discovered a new replacement was already being released. The full press release is here, but the highlights are an improved rear LCD & hybrid viewfinder, finer grain control on things like the aperture ring, exposure compensation dial, and up to 7 programmable buttons. While interesting, I’m not seeing anything here that makes this camera worthy of an upgrade so this one will be lower on my review priority list than the new lenses mentioned later.

When I see the back of this camera I get concerned as it appears they’ve decided to standardize on the X-T1 selector buttons that didn’t work very well on the X-T1 unit I reviewed.

X100T Rear View
X100T Rear View
featuring X-T1 selector buttons :(

Here’s the X100s Rear Screen view which shows a smaller screen than the new X100T but a new button layout which means some relearning for loyal X100 users. While I welcome the new display, I much prefer the x100s rear view design. From what I see everything on top and in front of the camera on the X100T improves for the better, so this may not be an issue for some.

X100s Rear View
X100s Rear View

One thing that perplexes me is why can’t Fujifilm just settle on one design? In my opinion, the best rear panel design in the Fujifilm line up is the X-E2, which is why I bought one myself:

X-E2 Rear View
X-E2 Rear View

This was a good design that worked and people liked it. I’m all for innovation and trying new things, but the new body changes seem to be making things worse rather than better.

New X-T1 Graphite Edition – Now Featuring Hard To Read Controls!

Fujifilm X-T1 (Graphite Silver Edition) - Rear View
Fujifilm X-T1 (Graphite Silver Edition) - Rear View

Pay $200 more to have harder to read controls – hum?

I think one of the things that gets people excited about the Fujifilm X series cameras is their cool retro style, and the silver editions are always a big hit. Over time I’ve discovered that the black ones are infinitely more usable in the real world because they resist scratches better and are easier to read in the bright sunlight. However, I’d still call all of the past silver editions as usable. However, I’m really perplexed by the press photo shown above of the rear of the X-T1 because even in the photo the controls are hard to read. Perhaps it is just a bad photograph, but I can certainly imagine that the black on graphite text is going to be a challenge to read in the real world use.

I’m also saddened to see that in designing a new camera body that they didn’t use the opportunity to come up with a better selector button design like they have in the X-E2.

As a camera, the X-T1 is fantastic – one of my favorite Fujifilm’s – but this edition doesn’t inspire much confidence. My advice is to stick with the black X-T1. At the time of this writing it is $200 cheaper and has easier to read controls.

Now for the really fantastic news – finally the ultimate zoom lens for portrait photographers!

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Lens
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Lens

Without question, my most beloved lens for real world shooting is my 70-200mm f/2.8 with image stabilization. As a result, I was thrilled to see Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Lens which has an 35mm effective focal length of 76 - 213 mm – close enough!

I want this lens big time as it’s the perfect zoom lens for how I enjoy photographing people. Granted, the 56mm f/1.2 I’ve tested has been one of my favorite thus far – it’s tough to live without a zoom in a camera system that is designed to be compact. Of course, some might say that this lens is too big for that reason, but personally I’m glad to see see it added to the line up.

Here’s more info on Fujifilm’s site about this cool new lens.

New 56mm f/1.2R APD – for bokeh junkies who thought the current 56mm f/1.2 wasn’t good enough

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R APD Lens
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R APD Lens

The still fairly new XF 56mm f/1.2 R is a fantastic lens, so I’m perplexed why a company with so many other needs in the lens department would release a new variant so soon. The answer lies in the APD designation which is supposed to offer much better bokeh than what is possible in the regular version – at a $500 premium. I’ll definitely have to test this lens because I was extremely happy with the bokeh of the non APD version that I tested as shown in the photo below, so I can’t see how the new one will really be $500 better.

However, for some more is better, so it’ll fun to be give it a try and see how it goes. However, it would have to be pretty incredible for me to recommend it over the existing 56mm which is a brilliant lens.

Here’s more info on Fujfilm’s site about APD.

For the record, I saw no problems with the bokeh from the original:


The original XF56mm f/1.2R does NOT have APD,
but I thought its bokeh quality was outstanding

(FUJIFILM X-E2, f/1.2 @ 56 mm, 1/300, ISO 400, No Flash – Unedited)

Conclusion

I’ll definitely get the lenses in for review, but I’ll not bother with the hard to read X-T1. The X100T will be in the queue for when I’m done with the lenses, or sooner if I get enough requests.

Share your thoughts – is this great news or would you have rather seen something else by Fujifilm announced?

[NOTE: Comments are not auto approved due to spam bots, so please only submit once and be patient for the comment to appear – sometimes days later. I do read every one!]

Where to order

Click the links above learn more or order from B&H. My friends at Adorama have a cool landing page for all of the new Fujifilm products featured here as well.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Thursday, May 9, 2013

REVIEW: Fujifilm X-S1–The Point & Shoot in a DSLR Costume with an awesome zoom lens

Fujifilm X-S1 Digital Camera (NOT a DSLR)
Fujifilm X-S1 Digital Camera (NOT a DSLR)

I have no inside info from Fujifilm, but based on my testing what you see in the shot above is the Fujifilm X100 / X10 in a DSLR looking shell with a better lens. If this were 2011 when this camera was originally released this might be an awesome thing, but this is 2013 so there’s some nasty facts that you need to know about this camera up front in 2013:

  1. This camera has the same crappy AF system that plagued the x100 which is shocking to me as even the x10 with the v1.0 firmware outperformed that. The x10’s v2.0 firmware puts it on par with the great improvements of the x20 so I was scratching my head as to why this camera only has a v1.01 firmware update. Hey Fujifilm – where’s the v2 firmware?!!!
  2. This camera is slow as a slug like the x100, yet it seems to have a dynamic range that is closer to the X10 than the X100.
  3. Did you hate the X10’s or X100’s original menu system? If so, they’re back from the dead here. I tolerated them before but now with the improvements in the new firmware I can’t imagine how I lived with this crap before!
  4. The build quality of the X-S1 feels cheap and very inferior to the the other X-Series cameras which have that solid German-like build quality feel (despite being made in Japan). This makes sense though as it’s price indicates that compromises had to be made.
  5. It’s easy to think this is a DSLR because it sure looks the part, but that lens is not interchangeable and there’s no mirror. It’s also a 2/3” sensor like the X10 not the APS-C sensor found in the X100 (or X100s).

Make no bones about it, this is a X10 in disguise with the flaws of the X100 instead of the benefits of the X10. As a result, it quickly went from being a camera I was so excited to test to one that disappointed me deeply.

If this camera had the X100s internals with a T5i like articulating LCD and a better quality shutter button I would have been gushing all over this camera. It’s definitely a case of so close, yet so far! I wanted to love it because it feels good in the hands and that big honking 26x optical zoom is a joy to use! However, this camera just falls short.

Things get ugly indoors


f/4.5 @ 39.1 mm, 1/200, ISO 3200, No Flash
Flashback to 2006 level high ISO performance

This shot was taken in a fairly bright room on a chamber of commerce sunny day, but ISO 3200 just sucks in anything but perfect light. As a result I found this camera to be darn near unusable in most places in my house during the day and not even worth turning on at night. The on-camera flash was actually worse than average so I quickly accepted the reality that this is a sunny day outdoor camera.

Real World Sample Images

Things do get better when you set this camera up for success. I have a selection of images that illustrate some points I wanted to raise about this camera and to share that it’s not all bad.

As always, these images ALL RIGHTS RESERVED (yes, even the lame ones <g>). You may not save, edit, print, redistribute or otherwise use them without expressed written permission.

The full set of images is available at http://photos.ronmartblog.com/fujifilm/x-s1, but here’s a few noteworthy images. Click the image for the original and view using the gallery to see EXIF information. All major settings were camera defaults and in most cases I’m using Aperture priority with Auto ISO (3200) and DR Auto or EXR mode (when noted). I’m also using the Velvia film simulation and either auto white balance or shade white balance (outdoor shots).


f/4 @ 15.1 mm, 1/60, ISO 320, No Flash
The detail from this lens blew me away and the small sensor made f/4 feel more like f/11


f/3.6 @ 15.7 mm, 1/250, ISO 1250, No Flash, EXR
Small sensor means good bokeh comes a little harder


f/4 @ 23.8 mm, 1/125, ISO 400, No Flash, Aperture Priority –1 EV
I love the in-camera color and lens on this camera


f/3.2 @ 6.1 mm, 1/60, ISO 1600, No Flash
There’s decent wide angle support at the effective 24mm zoom


f/5.6 @ 158.6 mm, 1/27, ISO 3200, No Flash
Max zoom is an astonishing 624mm effective zoom


f/3.2 @ 9.9 mm, 1/420, ISO 100, No Flash
EXR mode doesn’t disappoint as it exposes this scene darn near exactly as the eye sees it


f/3.2 @ 6.8 mm, 1/125, ISO 1250, No Flash
In the dingy dungeon piano practice room EXR mode did okay


f/3.2 @ 6.1 mm, 1/60, ISO 2500, No Flash
While preparing for the piano recital I was impressed at the wide angle view


f/5.6 @ 158.6 mm, 1/30, ISO 3200, No Flash
I was astonished at how close I could get to the piano from my seating position in the shot above


f/5 @ 53 mm, 1/60, ISO 3200, No Flash
I was able to easily get a front row seat to my daughters piano performance


f/5.6 @ 25.7 mm, 1/75, ISO 3200, No Flash
The super macro mode also found on my x10 & x20 worked well here,
but only one out of 8 shots actually came in sharp (typical fail shot)


f/5.6 @ 6.1 mm, 1/60, ISO 2000, No Flash, Aperture Priority, Velvia
Without EXR the blown highlights start to appear
Notice in the center of the image there’s a little tiny blue spot – it’s the stream shown below


f/5.6 @ 158.6 mm, 1/40, ISO 3200, No Flash
The big optical zoom is addicting when you can take a scene like above where you
hear water, but can barely see it. With the big zoom I was able to precision focus through
all of the brush to the water – impressive!


f/6.4 @ 37.6 mm, 1/70, ISO 3200, No Flash, Velvia Film Simulation
The small sensor proves to be advantageous in getting the whole snail in focus at only f/6.4
whereas even f/8 wasn’t enough to get the full snail in focus on the T5i (see here)


f/5.6 @ 11.6 mm, 1/80, ISO 2000, No Flash
Things start to go downhill quickly after ISO 1600
In-camera stabilization is inadequate by todays standards


f/4.5 @ 31.1 mm, 1/60, ISO 2000, No Flash
I wish I could show you better butterfly shots but the battery died after my third click
This is a fantastic butterfly camera – WHEN the damn thing focuses!

Conclusion

There were momentary flashes of brilliance with this camera, and I was impressed with the quality of the build in lens. Given the fact that most good lenses cost more than the entire cost of this camera, Fujifilm has done an impressive job with the lens. What’s more the tiny sensor works to a huge advantage by transforming a mediocre 6.1mm – 158.6mm lens into a beastly 24-624mm (35mm equivalent) 26x optical zoom. That is freakin impressive and a hell of a lot of fun to use! It’s really the one size fits most lens!

Sadly the cool lens and nice ergo of the body are where the good times end. Back for an encore is horrible battery life, horrific menus, useless AF performance indoors, painfully slow buffer flush performance, terrible burst mode and poor high ISO performance. Perhaps a v2.0 firmware like the X10 has would breathe new life into this camera to make it usable again, but as I tested it with v1.01 I quickly realized that there’s little to love about this camera. If you want a DSLR then get DSLR. If you want a point and shoot get a X10 or X20. If want better than 2/3” sensor performance with a fixed lens then get a x100s otherwise get a X-E1. This leaves no audience for this camera which means I give this a strong DO NOT BUY recommendation. I urge my readers to check out my Which camera should I buy? article and reviews below to help decide which camera is better suited for their needs. A X-S2 is rumored to be on the way as soon as the end of this month, so that might help things. However, I’d want to see this camera get the same sensor as the X100s. If the replacement is basically a big X20 then my advice would remain to skip this camera and go for the x20 or other options within the Fujifilm, Nikon, Sony or Canon platforms.

Where to order

Click here to order the Fujifilm X-S1 B&H web site.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these reviews:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Fujifilm X-E1 Real World Sample Images


FUJIFILM X-E1, f/8 @ 27.7 mm, 1/80,ISO 200, Shade WB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode

While out doing private training with one of my clients I had a chance to fire off a few frames with the Fujifilm X-E1 and managed to get some deliciously vibrant images. I thought I’d share them here for fun in case readers like you were wanting some better examples of this camera in the real world.

You can see my full review of this camera in these articles:

All of the images shown in this article were casual snapshots taken to illustrate a point to my student, so my apologies for the lack of consideration to people and horizontal & vertical lines in these shots. These shots were not intended to be displayed publically, but since I thought they were great samples of the X-E1’s ability to make great exposures under sometimes difficult conditions I thought I’d share.

Real World Samples Images

All of the following images are copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may view them but you may not store them on your computer, edit them, print them, or link them in any way without a signed written licensing agreement.

The images shown here are all in-camera JPEG’s with no post-processing (no cropping, sharpening, or editing of any sort). The vivid colors which some may enjoy and others may hate came from the built-in Velvia (Vivid) film simulation mode of the X-E1. I also shot with the Single Shot AF mode most of the time, but even in these conditions it had its moment where it failed to acquire focus no matter what I did so I gave up and used a different camera. This camera is great when it fires, but it can be frustrating sometimes when it can’t seem to find the contrast to focus even with larger AF points.

All of the images shown in this article and many more can be found in the sample gallery at http://www.ronmartinsen.com/fujifilm/x-e1.


Panoramic Mode - M


Panoramic Mode – L

The two examples above were take with Velvia film simulation.


X-E1, f/7.1 @ 18 mm,1/320, ISO 200, No Flash, Shade WB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode


X-E1, f/8 @ 20.5 mm, 1/90,ISO 200, No Flash, Shade WB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode


X-E1, f/8 @ 48.4 mm,1/100, ISO 200, No Flash, AWB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode


X-E1, f/10 @ 18 mm,1/250, ISO 800, No Flash, AWB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode


X-E1, f/9 @ 55 mm,1/240, ISO 200, No Flash, AWB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode


X-E1, f/4 @ 48.4 mm,1/2200, ISO 400, No Flash, AWB, Velvia Film Simulation Mode
High shutter & ISO used due to very windy conditions shooting this bouncing branch

Conclusion

While these images are casual snapshots, they are good enough to call done for personal photos intended for friends and family. I find them to be visually satisfying enough that my desire to own a X-E1 is growing stronger, despite the logical side of my head remembering some of my concerns during my review. This is a camera with a fantastic lens, sensor and internal image processing. The only thing not to love in my book is the price and AF performance.

Where to order

Click here to see all of the offerings on the B&H. My friends at Adorama have it available here. During the religious holiday breaks you can also place your order here on Amazon.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Friday, March 22, 2013

Fujifilm X-E1–Compared to X-Pro1, X100s, Sony RX100, & More (Part 2 of 2)

In my first article entitled Fujifilm X-E1–A Step in the Right Direction (Part 1 of 2), I covered the basics of this camera and included a bunch of example photos. In this article I’ll compare some bookshelf images to some popular cameras and wrap up with some miscellaneous feature areas.

Fujifilm X-E1 f/4 @ 55 mm, 1/110,ISO 800, No Flash
f/4 @ 55 mm, 1/110,ISO 800, No Flash, AWB, Velvia
The Easter Bunny Rocks with this camera!

Bookshelf Test

As expected, the X-E1 did very well with the bookshelf test. Its improved firmware over the X-Pro1 that I tested proved to be helpful, and the 18-55mm lens performed very well. This really isn’t an apples to apples comparison because I don’t have both cameras at the same time nor do I have the same lens and latest firmware installed. As a result, all you can take away from this is how the X-E1 performed at the time I tested it versus the other cameras at the time I tested them. All were shot under identical light conditions on the same tripod, but different lenses do make a big difference.


X-E1, f/5.6 @ 55 mm, 3.7s, ISO 200, No Flash, OIS Off, AWB, DR100, Provia, 10 sec Timer

Overall I felt like it was comparable to DSLR performance in terms of dynamic range and image sharpness. The noise level was quite a bit higher when getting beyond ISO 800 (more like DSLR’s were back in the 2006 time frame) which is problematic when you use this camera body for the evening dinner date with your significant other.

100% Crops

The following 100% crops are all generated in Lightroom 4.3 from the RAW files so that the default raw processing would be identical for each.

X-E1 100% Crop f/5.6 @ 55 mm, 3.7s, ISO 200
X-E1 100% Crop f/5.6 @ 55 mm, 3.7s, ISO 200

The X-E1 looks a bit sharper in my eyes, but that could be the shooting angle and other factors. Overall it’s very comparable to the X-Pro1, as expected.

Compared to the X-Pro1

X-Pro1, f/5.6 @ 35 mm, 8s, ISO 200
X-Pro1, f/5.6 @ 35 mm, 8s, ISO 200

Compared to the Sony RX100

DSC-RX100, f/8 @ 10.4 mm, 5s, ISO 200
DSC-RX100, f/8 @ 10.4 mm, 5s, ISO 200

The Sony seems to have a bit better dynamic range, but it also seems quite a bit softer when doing a raw comparison. One thing is for certain is that the Sony in-camera meter seems to be a lot more accurate whereas the Fuji’s tend to over expose a tad (in the default multi metering mode.

X-E1 at ISO 6400

Mouse over to see ISO 200 and mouse out to see ISO 6400
X-E1, f/5.6 @ 55 mm, 1/8,ISO 6400 (Full Size)
Mouse over to see ISO 200 and mouse out to see ISO 6400

At ISO 6400 the noise is pretty strong, but the image quality is still pretty good. The noise cleans up okay with Noiseware (or the in-camera JPEG processing) so it’s a usable image – but very noisy by today’s standards. The ISO’s greater than 6400 don’t support RAW so you end up with a nasty JPEG that you can’t fix. I do not recommend these modes unless you are desperate the get the shot.

Film Simulation Modes

This camera supports bracketing of Film Simulation modes (called picture styles on other cameras), so for fun I did it here using the 55mm ISO 200 setting. These are all in-camera JPEG’s (click for full-size originals):


X-E1 Provia (Standard) Film Simulation Mode


X-E1 Astia (Soft) Film Simulation ModeX-E1 Velvia (Vivid) Film Simulation Mode

While there are many times that I prefer Velvia, for this image it’s a little too oversaturated – especially when you get it on the web at sRGB. As a result, I find myself using Astia quite a bit (and no, it doesn’t seem to soften my images – it’s colors are just more muted that Vivid).

You can see more samples and full-size originals at http://www.ronmartinsen.com/fujifilm/x-e1. All images are Copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may view, but you may not save, edit, crop, print or otherwise use any images without permission.

Compared to other popular cameras in this class

Subjectively speaking I felt it did a better job at higher ISO’s and with in-camera noise reduction than the Olympus OM-D E-M5. I also felt like it was close enough in quality to the Sony RX100 that it’d definitely consider this a better buy than the Sony.

The Canon EOS M disappointed me, but if you pixel peep you’ll see that it compares very favorably in terms of overall image quality against the X-E1. With that said, the improvements in focus performance make the X-E1 my winner in this comparison.

I would say it’s worthwhile for X100 owners to upgrade to the X100s as there’s so many improvements that you’ll enjoy it quite a bit. However, if you want an interchangeable lens solution that is affordable than the X-E1 (and its replacement) make more sense.

Overall though, in this class of cameras I’d say the Sony NEX-7 is still my overall favorite for a combination of performance, features, and price. I think the X-E1 and X-Pro1 have better image quality but that doesn’t really matter if you don’t get the shot.

Dynamic Range Modes


This feature really helps in tough situations like this so you can see the skyscraper outside
Click the image to view the original in-camera image

Like other Fujifilm cameras, the X-E1 has multiple Dynamic Range modes. In fact, it even features bracketing of these modes, so I used that feature on the bookshelf to do a quick sample of three at DR100, DR200, and DR400. Just click here to view the DR100 version and use the right arrow key to see the others. Wait, what’s that – you didn’t any difference? Yeah, me either. If you look carefully there are some subtle differences, so it seems more optimized for brighter conditions (which I couldn’t test tonight) based on what I’m seeing in real world use. Personally I use DRAuto or DR100 most of the time, but I tried various modes when testing.

It should be noted that this is a JPEG only feature as the RAW file doesn’t have the notion of this post-processing concept.

Menu System

Much fuss is made about the menu system of the Fujifilm X series cameras, but honestly I’ve gotten used to it so it doesn’t bother me. I find what I need quickly and it works. There’s lots of  hard button controls on the camera too so I only need to use the menus when something is missing from the hard buttons. Most notably you can switch flash modes, but there’s no quick access to flash exposure compensation which is very annoying. The Q menu is pretty awesome at providing most features available very quickly and easily – I loved the densely populated design – I wish others would do that.

Video

As usual, I’m not video guy so I didn’t do much testing here. It’s about like an average point and shoot but it doesn’t focus on moving subjects very well. The image quality is above average though – in good light with the Provia film simulation.

Panoramic Mode


Panoramic Mode - M


Panoramic Mode – L

If you saw my X10 review you know that I love this feature in Fujifilm cameras. As usual, the JPEG it creates is stitched very well (when the subject you are shooting isn’t moving), but it seems a little slower on the X-Pro1 & X-E1 compared to the X10.

The two examples above were take with Velvia film simulation.

Conclusion

This is a good camera that will certainly please Fujifilm enthusiasts. After a fail with the X100 (in my opinion) and some bugs with the very expensive XPro-1, Fujifilm seems to have finally hit the mark. It’s still expensive in my book, but definitely a lot cheaper than a Leica.

This camera has that German build quality feeling and it’s a hell of a lot of fun to use. If I had the spare change I’d probably pick one up, but I wouldn’t consider it a replacement for a DSLR nor my point and shoot (currently a X10). To me, this is more of a serious hobbyist camera that is charming to use and creates very satisfying in-camera JPEG’s that some might find suitable enough to avoid spending much time in post-processing.

I’d call it an ideal street photography camera, and it’s great for food photography too. The live view helps a lot with manual focusing and the removal of the low pass filter also make it a great choice for landscape photography as well. It’s also great for hiking or situations where you just don’t want a big bulky camera.

I’d also say that the focus problems are solved if you use the largest two AF sizes in Single Shot mode. Smaller than that will require very good light.

Overall, I give this camera a guarded recommendation to those who can afford to pay for the wonderful quality body and very good sensor that it offers. It’s sure to please as long as you keep yourself in good light and stay out of situations that require ISO > 800.

Where to order

Click here to see the full selection of X-E1’s at B&H web site. My friends at Adorama have it available here, and you can find it here at Amazon.

If you think you might buy this camera, NOW is the time. B&H has this screaming deal that literally had me load my cart and almost pull the trigger:

Fujifilm X-E1 Bundle Special - Save 913.85!!!

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Need more info, check out this great Q&A about the X-E1

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this. B&H also loaned me the X-E1 and lens used for this review.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

REVIEW: Fujifilm X-E1–A Step in the Right Direction (Part 1 of 2)

Fujifilm X-E1 Digital Camera Kit with XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS Lens (Black)
Fujifilm X-E1 Digital Camera Kit with XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS Lens (Black)

Despite what some people might think, I love Fujifilm cameras. In fact, I find them a joy to use and addicting as hell. There is something magical about them that makes photography fun and a lot of the built-in features create in-camera images that just have that great film quality with all the benefits of the digital age (i.e., no grain, better color, raw, etc…). With that said, I pissed off A LOT of people by not declaring the X100 and XPro-1 the great things since sliced bread.

You see, I guess I missed the fact that I’m supposed to think they are perfect cameras and not say anything bad about them. Apparently they have no flaws, and to say otherwise makes me a <expletive> idiot according to a very vocal Fujifilm fan base. I guess these readers don’t look at reviews to hear the truth about a product, but rather to get validation for their brilliance for buying a Fujifilm camera. They are a proud bunch, and obviously there’s no room for improvement so to say otherwise means I obviously don’t know what I’m doing.

If you are in this camp then I’d suggest you stop reading this blog because I’ve tried to differentiate myself from publications who only look at their business model and write glowing reviews about everything that comes across their desk. You see, I think I owe it to my readers to tell you what I like and more importantly tell you what I don’t like. In fact, I think I even owe it to the manufacturers because if they really made the perfect camera they’d probably go out of business because they’d never be able to generate more income by releasing new products that improve upon their predecessors. In the end, I think I help my readers make an informed decision and hopefully provide feedback that helps Fujifilm make better products in the future.

With that said, while I loved the image quality of the X100 and XPro-1, and I absolutely enjoyed using them. Personally, I felt they were very flawed products. I wanted to love them, and I wanted to tell you to go out and buy one because they are so fun, but I couldn’t do it. I had to tell you the truth, and so it was with mixed emotions that I took on the task of reviewing the Fujifilm X-E1. It’s effectively a cheaper XPro-1, so I wasn’t expecting anything different. I was expecting to love the images and absolutely love shooting with it, but I was also expecting to be very disappointed in the auto focus system indoors.

At first, I found what I was expecting. However, I was having a lot of fun with the camera as I had with previous versions, so I wanted this to be “the one”. I want to love this camera and scream from the rooftops – YES, THIS IS THE COMPACT interchangeable lens camera you must get – but I couldn’t. Out of desperation, I did something I rarely do – I went to friends for help because I wanted to find a way to make this crappy AF system work so I could love this camera! In the end I did find workarounds, and I’m very happy. It’s not perfect, and I’m still eagerly awaiting the dream X series camera with interchangeable lenses that is a must have camera. However, this is a great step in the right direction.

Cool Overview Video

Fujifilm does a brilliant job with its web and video marketing of their cameras. It reminds of Mercedes Benz or Porsche where after watching the video or reading the stuff on the web - you want one! As a result, I thought I’d share this video to get you excited about a product that I’m excited about!

They have some great info on their web site as well as the mini-product site at http://fujifilm-x.com/x-e1/en/. I encourage you to check out both, but please come back here to finish reading my review!

Camera Body Features (Part 1 of 2)

Fujifilm X-E1 Digital Camera Kit with XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS Lens (Silver) - Rear
Fujifilm X-E1 Digital Camera Kit with XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS Lens (Silver) - Rear

XPro-1 users/shoppers will be very familiar and satisfied with the XE-1. While it does lack the optical viewfinder found the XPro-1’s awesome Hybrid Multi View finder, the OLED digital viewfinder is excellent. I was very satisfied with the live view feature both on the rear screen and view finder when pressing in the command dial (and rotate to the right for even greater zoom). It was very precise and made manual focusing quite enjoyable.

The X-E1 is smaller and lighter than the XPro-1 which is a good thing. Part of the weight (and cost) savings comes from the lack of the Hybrid Multi View finder and a smaller LCD. Personally I found these to be great compromises as optical viewfinders on this style of body sucks (you get a nice view of your lens) and I felt the LCD was plenty big for my needs.

The X-E1 adds an on-camera flash that is near useless if you use the kit lens. You’ll get lots of shots with the lens barrel (which are amplified if you use the hood, but still appear without the hood):

On-Camera Flash with Kit Lens - Near Useless
On-Camera Flash with Kit Lens - Near Useless

Compared to the XPro-1, the AF illuminator has moved closer to the handgrip which sucks because it’s going to be easy for some users to block it. It’s pretty obvious when the AF illuminator is on, so usually you’ll see when you are partially obstructing it.

The Q menu is outstanding and really helps for quick operation of the camera. It lacks quick access to flash exposure compensation which sucks, but otherwise it has everything you’d want and more (in fact, some might even say – too much).

The thing I really love about this and other Fujifilm cameras is the ability to quickly change the aperture and shutter speed with physical dials, as well as all of the hard buttons for AF drive & mode, metering, exposure lock, focus, and more. This is a photographers camera all the way and it’s part of what makes it such an absolute joy to use! Physically all the X series cameras are art and have that luxury feel that make you want to hold it. It reminds me of classic Mercedes where the philosophy (back then) was nothing but the best. You get that feeling with these cameras, so you treasure the body – but it’s tough as hell so you don’t need to baby it either.

My big grip about the X100 and XPro-1 has been their pitiful AF performance indoors. I’m happy to report great progress has been made to the point where I’d declare this system to be “usable” – not great, but definitely usable. I found that if I always pick my AF point when in S(ingle shot) AF mode that I get much better results than the useless Multi-Point mode (don’t even try it). With the help of existing users and the latest firmware I found choosing the medium or large AF point indoors is the way to go. The small AF point works fine in great light, but in low light (like anything indoors) it is near useless. Continuous focus works very well both in single shot and burst mode as well as low light. Manual is also usable with the great live view zoom magnification support by pressing the command dial as previously mentioned. While not perfect, I do found myself much less frustrated than any other version. If you have an existing X series camera, definitely get the latest firmware as hopefully you’ll see improvements too.

Another huge complaint I’ve had of this cameras predecessors was the painful performance writing to the SD card and time between shots. This camera felt pretty snappy by comparison, but if you go into burst mode expect a SUPER long wait before you can even review your images. This is unacceptable and something I seriously hope will be addressed in the firmware or a future model. Now, this isn’t really a burst mode camera so for many this won’t be an issue – especially since performance feels vastly improved over the other models I’ve tested.

Speaking of burst, you can go here to see a series of 12 shots (RAW+JPEG Fine) that I took using burst mode under very low tungsten light. While not perfect, it’s pretty good and definitely better than ANYTHING I’ve ever got from its predecessors.

Real World Sample Images

Like all my reviews, I like to provide in-camera JPEG original images as samples. You can find a complete gallery at http://www.ronmartinsen.com/fujifilm/x-e1. This annoys people who want to see the raws, but I don’t do that for three reasons:

  1. I don’t have a sever where I can store the RAW images. If you have an image where you really want to see a raw, then contact me and I’ll do what I can to try to get you the RAF file.
  2. What you see on your camera LCD, and what you make decisions based on the histogram is the in-camera JPEG – even if you shoot RAW. As a result, a lot of opinions are formed based on that JPEG (which is even embedded into your RAW file). To compare apples with apples and what the camera can do I think it makes sense to compare the RAW as you can always get better results that meet your needs with a RAW file, so it effectively only gets better from here!
  3. While I always shoot RAW, I also prefer to shoot RAW+JPEG and use the JPEG when it’s not a commercial shot. This camera creates gorgeous JPEG’s, and not everything I take with it is intended for my portfolio nor will every image get hours of Photoshop love. As a result, if I can get an image I love out of camera, isn’t that a good thing? I think it is and I think many cameras today do that, so why not place a value on a feature of the camera? If you want to pixel peep raws, go to DPReview – they have more people and can do a better job for pixel peepers than I have the bandwidth to do.

My shooting style with this camera is mostly aperture priority (which on this camera means I pick a fixed aperture and set the dial to auto shutter speed). I also use Auto (6400) for my ISO. I shoot in RAW+F(ine) with DRAuto or DR400 and WB Auto. I’m also very fond of the Velvia (Vivid) film simulation as I enjoyed Velvia film, so if you think the image is a bit too punchy and black then blame my film simulation selection. I like Astia (Soft) quite a bit too so if you see some images that are less punchy then that’s what I’ve chosen and if they are pretty neutral then I’ve chosen Provia (Standard).

I always pick my AF point when in S(ingle shot) AF mode, and I choose the medium or large AF point indoors as the small AF point is near useless in anything but great light. Continuous focus works well both in single shot and burst mode.

All images copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may view, but you may not edit print, or publish any of these photos in any way without a signed contract.

All images are exactly as they came out of the camera – zero post-processing, cropping, or anything. All in-camera processing was via camera settings and not in-camera editing.

With that said, here’s a few images from my sample gallery worth calling out (click to view the original in-camera JPEG):


Even with DR-100, the dynamic range is typical Fujifilm – excellent!


f/7.1 @ 24.3 mm, 1/30, ISO 800, No Flash (under nasty light)
Like its predecessors, the images from this great sensor are delicious!


f/4 @ 18 mm, 1/500, ISO 6400, No Flash
This is the first Fujifilm camera that I’ve used that did an okay job with my active toddler

Mouse over to see auto white balance, mouse out to see tungsten white balance
Mouse over to see auto white balance, mouse out to see tungsten white balance
Velvia (Vivid) Film Simulation used hence the deep darks and amplified colors


The monochrome film simulation has decent blacks and it’s not totally boring,
but I’d still use a third party product for best results (see
my black & white comparison)


f/7.1 @ 44.4 mm, 1/750, ISO 800
Unlike the X100, you no longer need the Luck of the Irish to get a shot outdoors!


Bokeh even at f/3.2 on a APS-C sensor with a “kit” lens is quite good
f/3.2 @ 22.3 mm, 1/125, ISO 6400, No Flash


f/3.6 @ 31.5 mm, 1/125, ISO 800, No Flash
Image detail is just excellent
(seeing the food in my son’s mouth, not so excellent – ha, ha)


f/5 @ 28.9 mm, 1/105, ISO 800, No Flash
Food photographers will love the compact size and killer image quality when dining


f/4 @ 55 mm, 1/28, ISO 6400, No Flash
Only in-camera post-processing (and my wife is wearing powder)
for ISO 6400, I was pleased!


f/4 @ 42.5 mm, 1/85, ISO 800, No Flash


f/4 @ 18.8 mm, 1/30, ISO 800, No Flash
This camera has a love affair with ISO 800 and 1/30 sec,
so active toddlers mean you have to manually choose your shutter speed


f/4 @ 55 mm, 1/110, ISO 800, No Flash
I’m really wishing the Easter bunny will give me one of these cameras,
and that Fujifilm will issue an update that doesn’t keep this camera locked
to ISO 800 when using ISO Auto (6400)


f/3.6 @ 19.6 mm, 1/30, ISO 5000, No Flash, Velvia, DR 100, AF-S (Large Point)
Lots of things suck about this shot, but the fact that this camera even took a shot
is a HUGE improvement over its predecessors. The X100 and XE-1 I tested
would never fire under this condition. All things consider, the focus is pretty okay too!


I was extremely pleased at how the camera would keep the focus even when momentary
distractions would enter the scene – even when using the large AF point

There’s a 101 and counting images in the gallery that represent what I call “real world” shots. These are not art shots – they are what normal people take when around the house or with the family. If you like what you see, then you’ll like the images you get from this camera.

Conclusion

Learn more in Part II: Fujifilm X-E1–Compared to X-Pro1, Sony RX100, & More (Part 2 of 2)!

Where to order (SALE – SAVE $913.85!!!!)

Click here to see the full selection of X-E1’s at B&H web site. My friends at Adorama have it available here, and you can find it here at Amazon.

If you think you might buy this camera, NOW is the time. B&H has this screaming deal that literally had me load my cart and almost pull the trigger:

Fujifilm X-E1 Bundle Special - Save 913.85!!!

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity