Showing posts with label AskRon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AskRon. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Ask Ron: Using Photoshop and Lightroom on a 4k/5k UHD Displays

A reader was telling me today that they didn’t care for using Adobe Photoshop or Lightroom on a 4k, 5k or UHD display because the UI elements were too tiny. The good news is that if you are using CC 2015 or later editions, it’s easy to fix this problem.

For Photoshop you simply need to open the preferences dialog and select the Interface page. From there, you just change the “UI Font Size” to Large and “UI Scaling” to 200%. While the latest version seems to work ok with the “Auto” setting, it doesn’t work  properly in older builds of Photoshop CC 2015.

Here’s an animated GIF that illustrates what values that need to be changed:

Photoshop CC 2015 - Preferences | Text UI Font Size & UI Scaling
Photoshop CC 2015 - Preferences | Text UI Font Size & UI Scaling

Lightroom works in a similar way, but you only need to go to the Interface page and change the “Font Size” setting to “Larger – 200%”. 

Lightroom CC 2015 - Set Font Size to Larger 200%
Lightroom CC 2015 - Set Font Size to Larger 200%

Naturally these are recommendations as some will prefer the smaller UI and extra screen real estate, while others like the bigger UI but have a tolerance for smaller fonts. The good news is that this is the general pattern to fix the problem so you can choose the values that meet your needs best.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Ask Ron: How do I ship my prints?

While I mention this topic in my Printing 101 eBook, not everyone has my book so I thought I’d respond to a readers email today via a quick “Ask Ron” article.

Question

Here’s essentially what today’s reader was asking:

How do I ship my prints and are there any problems with rolling papers – especially thick media like Epson Hot & Cold Press Papers? Would there be any issues to be concerned about?

Answer

Shipping prints is tricky because a lot of things can go wrong in transit. To minimize risk you’ll want to pack the print carefully and use a little extra stuffing paper to make sure the print doesn’t slide and shift in transit. I’ll list the steps on how I ship a print, but I’m starting at the point where the print is done so if you are shipping a canvas or are printing on a paper that scratches easily then I’ll assume you’ve already protected the print prior to shipping.

Here’s what I do…

Step 1 – Cover the print in Acid-Free Tissue

Lineco Buffered Acid-Free Tissue Paper
Lineco Buffered Acid-Free Tissue Paper

Lineco Buffered Acid-Free Tissue Paper comes in sheets (my preference) and rolls, and I use it all the time to protect prints even when I’m not shipping them. Once I take a print off the printer I put one of these sheets on top to protect the print from dust, scratches, etc… However, when rolling up your print for shipping then it really helps a lot to avoid damage from scratches which can occur during the rolling process.

Step 2 – Optionally place it in a photo bag

Lineco Archivalware Photo/Art Bags
Lineco Archivalware Photo/Art Bags

After my print has degassed, I place it in a Lineco Archivalware Photo/Art Bags and leave the end open unless I have a special reason to close it. As a result, when shipping I use these bags for added protection. While it is somewhat redundant to do both, that’s what I do and it’s worked well for me. You can certainly skip one or the other, but I don’t.

Step 3 – Roll and Place in Mailing Tubes


Mailing tubes on Amazon

When it comes time to pack up the print, the most economical way to go is using a mailing tube. A general rule of thumb is to get the biggest diameter tube that you can practically use as the less tight you have to roll then the easier it will uncurl when it arrives at its destination.

It’s highly recommended that you cut the tube to the length you need to avoid the print shifting in transit. If that isn’t possible or practical then you’ll want to use some more Lineco Buffered Acid-Free Tissue Paper to avoid damaging the edges of your print. DO NOT use newspaper to stuff the tube as the nasty ink will transfer to your print and ruin it.

Be sure to tape or staple the plastic caps as they will come out in transit if you don’t.

Alternatives to tubes?

Lineco Museum Quality Storage Box
Lineco Museum Quality Storage Box

While it is much more expensive and challenging to pack, some people prefer to ship their prints flat. If it’s just one print you can put it between a couple shets of cardboard and be in good shape assuming that you’ve taken the aforementioned protection steps. If you’ll be shipping multiple prints, then you might want to consider an exact fit Lineco Museum Quality Storage Box. I use the larger capacity version of these to store my prints at home too, so these can be purchased in a size that meets your needs.

Again, you’ll want to avoid room for the prints to shuffle so inserting a piece of foam core board or cardboard to fill the gap and taping the edges is recommended.

Tip for Signing Your Prints

image
I use Number 02 PIGMA Micron Ink Pens

I always recommend signing your print using archival PIGMA ink before sending it to anyone, and I personally leave print master notes on the back of the print to remind me of what I did to make that print in case I need to do a reprint in the future. You can learn more about this process in more in my Printing 101 eBook.

Tip for the Print Recipient

Curling is inevitable when shipping in tubes
Curling is inevitable when shipping in tubes

When your customer gets the print, you can advise them to remove it from the roll and unroll it right away. Initially they will look like the prints in the photo above, so you’ll want to advise them to roll them the opposite direction and use the shipping tissue paper (and bag if you used it) to protect the print. Here’s a video that shows how people do this counter curl:

 

Conclusion

While this article might come across as a Lineco advertisement, I assure you that I have no affiliation with them and have never communicated with them prior to this article. I just trust the Lineco brand after experimenting with cheaper alternatives. This isn’t to say there aren’t other good products at a cheaper price, but I haven’t found any that have met my needs yet.

An important thing to keep in mind that all of this preparation is expensive both in terms of time and materials, so be sure when you are giving your clients a quote that you don’t forget this expense and only think about shipping costs.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Ask Ron: First Thoughts about the Canon 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Canon EOS 7D Mark II

One of my readers asked me for my thoughts on the new Canon 7D Mark II, so here’s what I said…

Due to the wave of new product announcements it may be a while before I get around to reviewing one, but on paper it sounds very exciting. The 7D was a revolutionary body when it was released and for quite some time until the 5D Mark III & 1D X came out, it really had some features (like Zone AF) that I really longed for. Now one thing I hated about the 7D was its very mediocre image quality due to its sensor (shared with the 60D) – it just had too many megapixels for the size of the chip which resulted in more noise, softness and a lack of dynamic range that drove me nuts.

What I see in the new 7D Mark II is a camera that once again brings a lot of great features to the table and thankfully uses the same control layout as the 5D Mark III. I think this is huge because it makes a viable option as a 2nd body for 5D Mark III shooters who can benefit from the reach and performance this body offers, without having the lame design found on the 6D (which lacks the all-important joystick).

Woohoo - it's the 5D Mark III Rear Panel Layout
Woohoo - it's the 5D Mark III Rear Panel Layout

I’m glad to hear about the support for up to ISO 16000, but I’ll need to see it in action before I can really comment on its performance. I’m also glad to hear about the great 10fps burst mode with  dual DIGIC 6 processors and 65pt AF system that can keep up with the action as well as a buffer that can swallow up to 31 RAW files (using UDMA 7) before it chokes. I think these factors make it a much more practical sports camera than the highly anticipated Nikon D750 which appears to be competing more with the 5D Mark III than the 7D Mark II.

The top is just like the 5D Mark III with a more rugged design for the text on the mode dial
The top is just like the 5D Mark III with a more rugged design for the text on the mode dial

One very exciting feature to see built in finally is the intervalometer which avoids the need for the expensive and confusing to use TC-80N3. This will make this a great choice for time lapse photographers, and videographers on a budget are sure to enjoy this camera as well.

Conclusion

Overall I’d have to say that on paper this camera seems to be worth the wait and includes many features people have been longing for. It’s insane in this day and age that there’s a built-in GPS yet Wi-Fi (which is becoming standard on most cameras) is a ridiculously expensive $849 option. While I personally hate using WiFi on the camera, it is an option that people come to expect and desire so I’m perplexed why this camera wouldn’t have it when the 6D has it built in.

It’s a little thing, but I also suspect people will appreciate having the built-in flash as there are times when it comes in handy.

All in all, I think it’s a worthy upgrade for anyone who has an investment in EF-S lenses that they’d like to continue to use. This seems to be the best APS-C camera Canon has ever made, so that’s something for cropped sensor fans to be very excited about.

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order today on the B&H web site. My friends at Adorama have it available here and Amazon has it here.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Monday, August 13, 2012

Ask Ron: Does the 5D Mark III make autofocusing faster with traditionally slow focusing lenses?


Keeping up with a toddler is tough enough, slow AF lenses take that challenge to a whole new level. My hit rate was about 1 out of every 20 for this fast little dude
Canon
5D Mark III with Canon 85mm f/1.2L – 1/125sec @ f/2 ISO 400 (flash fired)

A reader writes:

I’ve heard that the autofocus system in the Canon 5D Mark III is so good that even traditionally slow focusing lenses work much better than in the past. Is that true?

I’ll cut to the chase and say, not really. In my real world testing I found that two of my favorite, but also most frustrating lenses (which I’ve bought and sold twice) performed just as bad as they always have with cameras from the past. This is a subjective test, not scientific one, so some may choose to argue with me. However, I didn’t find myself saying “wow, look at all of these perfectly focused shots I’m getting”. Instead, I was typically saying “f#@k” as shot after shot would often be out of focus.


Even when you do everything right and hit your target, these lenses can still disappoint
85mm f/1.2L at f/1.2 for 1/125 sec at ISO 400 (flash fired)
Focus was aimed at the right eye but I hit the eyebrow due to the shallow DOF of f/1.2


Remember, a f/1.2 lens is going to have a shallow depth of field
which is a challenge even if the camera nails the focus
50mm f/1.2L at f/4 for 1/125 sec ISO 1250 (flash fired)

Now I’ll add the disclaimer that at f/1.2, it doesn’t matter what lens you are using or how fast it is or the camera its attached to. f/1.2 is shallow so moving subjects are going to cause misses unless you track subjects like a sniper. I tried to discount those “user error” misses from my testing and just pay attention to my keeper rate when doing typical shooting (sometimes as high as f/4 or f/5.6).


Out of 40 shots, only a handful acquired the focus quickly enough for the moving subject
Most often the camera would hunt for focus so long that the shot was gone
50mm f/1.2L at f/4 for 1/125 sec at ISO 1250 (flash fired)


Ultra-low light, kids and these lenses? Fugetaboutit! I was aiming for the eye and got the ear
as the camera was hunting for a while with this lens to get any focus at all
50mm f/1.2L at f/4 for 1/125 sec and ISO 1250 (flash fired)

Keep in mind that it’s in my best interest to tell you that these lenses do focus faster as your buying them from links in this blog helps support what I do. However, I’m here to tell you the truth as I see it, and I say that these great pieces of glass still focus like crap with current cameras like the 5D Mark III. Hopefully we’ll get new versions in the future that address this problem.

I should also note that I don’t expect that this is isolated to just these two lenses. Great lenses like the 135mm f/2 are probably just as slow too.

The Test Lenses

The Canon 50mm f/1.2L and 85mm f/1.2L (available for rent by LensProToGo.com) are legendary for their wonderful bokeh and excellent sharpness. They are indeed magical lenses, but for those who have plunked down the $1500 – $2000 for these two lenses, you’ve quickly found out that it’s easier to get an out of focus shot than it is to get one of those magical shots. Some say that the big heavy glass is hard for the little AF motor to move, and others cite the longer minimum focus distance. However, the real reason doesn’t matter – the fact is that these are very tough lenses to use if you are taking photos of anything that moves as they are glacially slow to acquire a focus and often will hit the wrong spot or not track very well. As a result, these are lenses that you do have to spray and pray a little bit with as everyone I’ve known (including some very well known pros) has said that no matter what camera you have, you’ll have more misses than hits.

When you nail a shot with these lenses it’s still magical, so I’m not saying don’t buy these lenses – I’m just saying set your expectations properly and plan to be deleting more than you keep with these lenses – even if you have a fancy new camera. Personally, slow focusing lenses these will stay on my “rent as needed” list rather than my buy list.

Given the legendary status of these lenses and the fact that they are generally a pain in the ass to use, I thought they’d be great candidates to use to answer this question.

For the record, the 50mm f/1.2L performed SIGNIFICANTLY better than the glacially slow 85mm f/1.2L.

How I Tested

I followed my family members (mostly my toddler) around in low light situations and attempted to grab some candid shots. I typically used the spot auto focus feature (new for the 5D Mark III & 1D X) as I find that it has laser pointer focus with other lenses. However, I tried all of the different focus types when I was getting a high fail rate just to ensure that I wasn’t hitting a limitation of the focus mode I was using.

I tried with both AI Servo for moving subjects and One Shot for stationary subjects. Generally speaking, AI Servo failed really bad with these lenses.

Since I was using a flash, the 1/125 sec shutter wasn’t typically an issue as the flash would freeze movement. If I was shooting without a flash, I would have shot many of these at 1/500 sec or faster.

What about the 1D X?

From what I saw during my real world testing, my 1D X offered no measurable improvements over the 5D Mark III in this particular test with these two lenses. I’ve noticed improvements in its AF system overall with super fast AF lenses like the 70-200mm, but the slow focusing lenses are still cumbersome with the 1D X as well from what I’ve seen.

Special Offer

This article was brought to you by LensProToGo.com. They generously donated a free rental of the 50mm f/1.2L and 85mm f/1.2L for the weekend so that I could experiment with them to answer this question.

LensProToGo.com has been gracious enough to offer you a 5% discount off any order when you enter the coupon code MART5 as shown below in yellow:

LensProToGo.com Coupon Code

Where to Buy?

Click here to buy the 50mm f/1.2L from B&H, or click here to buy it from Adorama.
Click here to buy the 85mm f/1.2L from Adorama, or click here to buy it from B&H.

Disclosure

If you make a rental or purchase using select links in this article, I may make a commission. See the special offer for more disclosure details.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Ask Ron: Canon 600EX-RT Radio Wireless and High Speed Sync on Sunny Days


1/400 sec at f/5.6, ISO 200 – Fill Flash via High Speed Sync

After doing my Canon 600EX-RT Wireless Real World Test article several readers have asked me how they perform when being shot wirelessly on sunny days, and a couple people asked about their wireless high speed sync performance for use as a fill flash.

I tried to answer all these questions in one shot above where the sun was setting. I shot directly into the sun with my camera set to 1/400 sec and used an external 600EX-RT on an umbrella as a fill flash via high speed sync. I got the desired lens flare and warm sunset look, but I also got the fill light to keep my subject from being backlit. I also got catch lights in her eyes.

There’s minimal processing on this shot taken from a Canon 5D Mark III that has been processed mostly in Photoshop CS6 Beta and Lightroom 4 from the original RAW which was processed in DPP. It’s not a portfolio shot, but it does prove the point that I can indeed get the fill flash using high speed sync (required at anything over 1/200 sec on this camera). I can also get more ambient light on the background if I want it by simply raising the ISO which I did not want to do for the this shot.

The 600EX-RT’s fired every time in the 58 times I tested this scenario, so they had no trouble with the sun (which should be true of any radio triggered flashes).

I hope that helps those who were interested in this question!

If you have a question for me, feel free to send me a mail with the subject Ask Ron. I can’t promise I’ll answer every question, but you may see your response on the next Ask Ron!

Best wishes,
Ron

Related Articles

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links in this article, I may make a commission.

Friday, April 6, 2012

New Series: Ask Ron

Readers like you have made this blog bigger than I had ever dreamed it would be. To thank you for all you’ve done, I am starting up a new series called “Ask Ron” where YOU are the center of attention.

What is Ask Ron?

Simply put, this is your way to ask me a question about Photography or Photo Editing and I’ll answer your photo on the blog for you and others to see the response. You can remain anonymous if you like, but I’m looking for real world common problems to which I’ll provide advice on how to solve the issue.

Show me your ugly messed up photos

Got a shot that came out blurry, too dark, too bright, too orange, etc… then send it to me and I’ll give you my 2 cents on what could be done to improve it / fix the problem. In fact, in some cases if the fix is an easy fix I may just video myself fixing it for you and post the result on the blog.

Rules & Guidelines

Here’s how it will work – just send me a link to your photo or send it to me via email (JPEG only and < 5MB please). Many times I need the metadata that is in your photo to understand what went wrong, so please do not strip that out (i.e., don’t use Minimize Embedded Data in Lightroom when exporting). Links should be from services like Zenfolio, Smugmug, 500px, Flickr, etc… NO FACEBOOK or G+ links! You are free to password protect your image, but I’ll need to download it for posting to the blog if it is going to be part of Ask Ron. I do this because I don’t want broken links down the road because you decided to move your file or discontinue your service.

Photos should always be JPEG with the sRGB color space (if you don’t know what that means, then you are probably okay).

The rules are subject to change. There is no purchase necessary to participate and no prize will be awarded for participation.

To submit a question or photo, simply visit http://ronmart.zenfolio.com/contact.html and click the email link to see my email address for the blog. Please use it, but don’t abuse it.

FAQ

Does this cost anything?

Nope

How often can I submit a question?

Once per week, but if your photo is selected you are ineligible for 3 months

What about the rights to my photo?

Well, for starters I want to see your photos that need help so odds are they aren't ready for your portfolio anyway right? With that said, I only plan to put the photo on my blog (and its image server) for the purpose of the article. It won't be used for anything else. You retain the rights for your photo, but you release me to use it for the blog article.

Why are you doing this? What's the catch? Aren't you only in this for the money?

I wish this blog paid well enough to where I was only in this for the money, but that's far from the truth - my day job pays me a heck of a lot more! I'm doing this to repay my loyal readers for supporting my blog over the years by posting links on other forums and using my links when making purchases. There's nothing in this for me beyond less sleep and making someone happy.

How often will Ask Ron appear on your blog?

I'll try to do one response a week - time permitting, so realistically we are probably looking at a maximum of about 40 per year if this takes off. If it doesn't then the series will fade way without fanfare.

What if I'm not from the United States?

Who cares, neither is my wife! I've got readers in 180 countries - it would rock to be able to do an Ask Ron for at least one in every country so foreign readers send me your photos! I especially love ones that show me your beautiful cities and people! (oh, and broken English is fine – do your best)

You already answer my questions via email now. Will that change?

Yes! It's becoming unpractical for me to answer so many questions via email, so I'll try to funnel responses to Ask Ron articles. I still might take one or two here and there if they interest me, but generally speaking I'll only answer questions that pertain to the blog and its articles or offers moving forward.

I'm worried about being embarrassed. What are you going to do to keep from saying this is my photo and it sucks?

If you like you may keep your photo anonymous. I can't guarantee anonymity as you might have something embedded in your image metadata that I might miss, but I'll do my best for those that request. If you don't request it, then I may say your name so be sure to request anonymity if that is important.

Can I send you a link to my portfolio and let you pick an image to talk about?

No. You may submit one photo per the rules and guidelines stated above. A failure to follow the rules will result in your mail being deleted. If you want that, then consider my Portfolio Review Service.

What types of photos are allowed or excluded?

Anything is allowed as long as it isn't illegal (i.e., child porn). However, I'll use my discretion about what gets posted to the blog, so in some cases I may blur out part of your photo or crop out the offensive part to keep from upsetting my readers. From there, it's your call.

What if you can't fix my photo?

I'll do my best to tell you how you could do things better next time to get the results you desire.

This is awesome. What can I do for you in return?

Do what you’ve already been doing – spread the word about this blog to all of your friends. Post links to your favorite articles in your responses to questions on other forums (but please don’t just spam them – you’ll get banned), social networks and in email to your friends. If you don’t feel comfortable doing that, then just read the articles here and use the links when making a purchase.

Disclosure

This is not a contest – you don’t really win anything other than a response. If you make a purchase using links on this blog, I may get a commission.