Ron Martinsen's Photography Blog

Showing posts with label AutoFocus. Show all posts

Monday, April 11, 2016

REVIEW: Fujifilm X-Pro 2 & 16-55mm f/2.8 – The Auto Focus King? (Part I of II)

Fujifilm X-Pro2 Mirrorless Digital Camera

In 2012 when I reviewed the X-Pro1, my only experience with Fujifilm X-Series cameras was with the X100 and X10. The image quality impressed me, but my lack of familiarity with cameras in this class caused me to give it a pretty harsh review.

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Lens

Fast forward to 2016 and I’m a happy owner of a X-E2 and I’ve got experience reviewing over a dozen Fujifilm cameras so my opinions are very different. This time I’m also pairing it with the much more practical Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR zoom instead of the razor sharp Fujifilm 35mm f/1.4 XF R prime lens.

Why?!!!

X-Pro 2 Hybrid Viewfinder Design

While I love a lot of things about this camera, with all of the offerings in Fujifilm’s X-Series line up, I still scratch my head and wonder why this model exists. A big chunk of its cost is related to its hybrid viewfinder which allows a practical electronic viewfinder and an utterly useless rangefinder style optical viewfinder.

Yes, if you are a masochists and enjoy seeing the barrel of your lens and your thumb when viewing optically for an image that looks nothing like what you’ll actually capture, then I guess it makes sense for you. However, anyone in their right mind is going to switch to the excellent electronic viewfinder and get an image that actually represents the photo you’ll actually be taking.

I felt this way then and 4 years later I still find this style of optical rangefinder viewfinder to be an artifact from photography’s past that should be long forgotten. I see no point in not being able to see through the lens and see what happens when I turn the focus ring or zoom (although this camera does at least have an overlay to help with that).

The good news is that this camera comes with an excellent electronic 2.3 million pixel viewfinder that feels far superior to its predecessor. As a result you see a beautiful image that does in fact represent what you’ll actually see on the computer. However, the X-E2s has the same resolution viewfinder so wouldn’t that mean this is like the X-Pro1 vs X-E1 all over again where you pay a premium for a useless optical viewfinder?

Well fortunately, that’s not the case this time. Fujifilm has learned from its mistakes it seems and now has added a higher resolution sensor, an extremely useful joystick, improved autofocus and more (see here). As of the time this article was written, this was the best Fujifilm body available, but one can’t help but wonder (and hope) the replacement for the X-T1 will be this and more. If that happens, we’ll be back to my why question again – why would anyone really want this model? For now, the answer is obvious when you see the rest of my review – but I think it’s reign as being at the top of the Fujifilm X-Series line will be short lived (or so I hope).

What I love about the X-Pro2

Proper Selector Buttons Return!!!
Proper Selector Buttons

While I still think that the overall controls of the X-T1 make it the most desirable Fujifilm camera on the market, I absolutely hated its horrible selector buttons.

It is with abundant joy that I can report that the X-Pro2 features wonderfully responsive selector buttons like its predecessor. In fact, the rear panel features an extremely useful joystick for changing the autofocus point as shown here:

X-Pro 2 Rear Panel with Joystick

With 196 contrast detection points and 77 phase detection points, you are now able to put your focus point exactly where you want it which is a huge improvement over most cameras made today.What’s more, the focus is outstanding – especially it’s auto modes like eye detection as shown here:

f/2.8 @ 55mm for 1/550 sec at ISO 400
I took this shot three times because I couldn’t believe it could automatically focus on my son’s eye so easily – but it did – all three times!

I was reviewing the Sony a6300 at the same time I was reviewing this camera, and I was blown away with how well both cameras managed to get eye focus so quickly and easily under tough circumstances. However, as good as the Sony was, the X-Pro 2 was better – way better – in this respect. I was floored!

f/2.8 @ 55mm for 1/125 sec at ISO 400
My head was outside of this log, but I just stuck the camera in and shot blind.
My faith in the AF system was justified, because it pulled off a shot that wouldn’t have been possible otherwise.

In all my years of reviewing cameras – including the mighty 1D X and D4s, nothing I’ve ever tested as performed so well in real life scenarios – and it does it automatically so that even a novice could nail the two shots above – amazing!

In fact, if I had a single word to summarize the X-Pro 2 it would have to be fast. The focus was fast, the burst mode was fast, the start up time was fast, and shutter lag was non-existent.

Aside from these points, it was pretty much everything that Fujifilm fans already love about the X-Series platform – improved.

Now for the bad news

f/2.8 @ 55mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 3200
Black bear was sadly a black blob with the 1.0 firmware
(Photo taken in captivity at Northwest Trek)

Fujifilm is great at doing firmware updates to update customer concerns, but when I was field testing I didn’t have the luxury of installing the recently released 1.1 firmware. As a result, I found myself very frustrated with shots like the one above taken using the Standard Provia film simulation mode because my bear shot ended up being a huge black blob. Between the poor performance of the in-camera noise reduction at 3200 ISO (a common historical issue with Fujifilm) and extremely dark shadow areas, I ended up losing the opportunity for a decent bear shot.

While I could have set the Shadow Tones to –2 to compensate for this problem, I do my best in reviews to try to test the camera as close to out of the box as possible – excluding basic settings for aperture, shutter speed, and ISO of course.

f/2.8 @ 55mm for 1/125 sec at ISO 500

Similar issues were found in the highlights on some exposures as well making me wonder exactly what DRO Auto was really doing, as it certainly wasn’t protecting my highlights and shadows like the x10’s legendary EXR feature did!

Fortunately, these were both images that were easily correctable using the RAW thanks to Adobe Camera Raw 9.5 support for this camera.

I’m also still bummed that they haven’t added a pop-up flash to this camera. While pop-up flashes do suck, sometimes it is better than nothing it at all. That could have saved my bacon for shots like this where I didn’t realize the default auto ISO max sensitivity was set to 800 for Auto 3:

f/5.6 @ 26mm for 1/10 sec at ISO 800

Not realizing this at first, I found myself shooting at 1/10 of a second for many shots when I was indoors, so I only ended up with one reasonably sharp interior shot:

f/5.6 @ 19mm for 1/10 sec at ISO 800 – Handheld

It was a user mistake which happens sometimes when going forth between two cameras at the same time (remember, I was also reviewing a Sony a6300 at the same time). However, I’m puzzled why a camera in 2016 would top out its ISO at 800 and find it reasonable to go to 1/10 sec shutter speed. It would be fine if I were on a tripod, but in the real world you get burned with settings like these. As a result, I became more careful to watch the auto logic of this camera.

Real World Shots

People don’t read manuals and they rarely take time to learn how to use their cameras. When I test, I like to have a combo of brain dead shooting scenarios (like many would do with cell phones) sprinkled with some serious shooting where I actually dial in all settings manually. This results in what I call real world shots because they are unplanned, unedited shots that just occur during the course of everyday life.

I hope you enjoy them compared to the heavily processed shots found elsewhere as they more closely represent what real people will really get out of this camera if they were to take it home and use it themselves.

The shots below and elsewhere in this article are completely unedited in-camera JPEG’s that feature camera defaults unless otherwise noted. These images may be viewed when reading this article, but you may not print, edit, modify, redistribute, etc… any of these images in any way. They are copyright Ron Martinsen – All Rights Reserved.

Click the photos to see full-size, unedited original in-camera JPEG’s.[And yes, I did shoot raw too – they just aren’t on the web].

Click here to get a full gallery of images taken while I was reviewing this camera..

f/10 @ 55mm for 1/400 sec at ISO 200
Aside from needing a faster shutter speed (user error), the X-Pro 2 did everything right for this first shot I took with this camera. That bug is alive too, hence the slight motion blur.

f/2.8 @ 36mm for 1/100 sec at ISO 200
Babies are tough to photograph because they never stay still, but the auto focus on the eyes impressed me from the first few minutes I used this camera. Any parent or grand parent who has tried to take this shot knows just how easy it is to get blurry eyes, and the shutter lag of the original X-Pro 1 would have certainly resulted in a missed opportunity. Not anymore!

f/2.8 @ 45mm for 1/600 sec at ISO 200
Wild boys are even worse, but once again the X-Pro 2 just nailed it

f/5 @ 40mm for 1/210 sec at ISO 200

f/2.8 @ 19mm for 1/210 sec at ISO 200
Thanks to a APS-C sensor, you get some blurring at f/2.8…

f/5.6 @ 19mm for 1/60 sec at ISO 200
… but at as little as f/5.6 you’ll get a lot of things in focus,
so don’t expect full-frame DSLR bokeh

f/2.8 @ 55mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 200
Sadly the continuous auto focus mode loses facial tracking, and the zone tracking wasn’t up for the task. While I could probably get better results if I had more time with this camera, typical parents should expect a lot of blurry shots of running kids even at 1/1000 sec.

f/2.8 @ 29mm for 1/950 sec at ISO 400
After I got more comfortable with this camera, I was able to have better results for action series like these monkey bars shots. While it’s no 1D X or D4s, it did bring home more keepers than any previous Fujifilm I’ve tested.

f/2.8 @ 55mm for 1/250 sec at ISO 200
Velvia film simulation still has a place, and it’s definitely with the flowers!

f/2.8 @ 550mm for 10/640 sec at ISO 400
This was pretty much how I felt every time I took a shot of moving people while using this camera. It nailed the auto focus on the eyes almost every time!

f/2.8 @ 24mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 400
Another blind shot that makes it look so easy that you start to believe
that even a 5 month old baby can do a selfie with this camera!

f/2.8 @ 18mm for 1/550 sec at ISO 400
Again, it struggled with the slide as face mode must be disabled for continuous shooting.
Out of six attempts, I only had one series turn up any relatively in-focus shots. With my DSLR’s (including the Nikon D7200), it’s much easier to get an in-focus action shots

f/2.8 @ 17mm for 1/2200 sec at ISO 400
Even in low contrast light, it nails the focus.
Most cameras would have picked a subject in the background, the had or jacket to focus on.
I was continuously impressed with the eye focus feature.

f/2.8 @ 53mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 200
A massive crop from the original (click image), still results in usable images for the web when you find yourself with the wrong lens on a moving tour bus

f/8 @ 55mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 400
Fujifilm cameras are loved by landscape shooters,
and this shot from a moving bus reminded me why I love them too.
The in-camera processing dishes out JPEG shots that are delicious,
and unfortunately hard to reproduce with the RAW.

f/11 @ 55mm for 1/400 sec at ISO 200
Quick snapshots like this made me wish I had a tripod and more than a few seconds to spend with tis camera in the mountains, as I think it will do spectacular even at f/11 when you can set up on a tripod and dial in the focus just right

f/4 @ 55mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 400
Fujifilm cameras have this magic that makes you see the world differently.
They make you stop, notice and capture things
you’ve walked past hundreds of times without noticing.
The X-Pro 2 brings that magic back to every day life.

Click here to get a full gallery of images taken while I was reviewing this camera..

Conclusion

Yes, you can capture that fleeting moment with the X-Pro 2
– even without looking through the viewfinder –
it’s that good!

Life gives you split seconds to capture that decisive moment, but for a long-time Fujifilm cameras weren’t up to the task. The AF struggled to acquire focus, the start up times were painfully slow, and the shutter lag meant any good kids shots were pure luck.

With the X-Pro 2, those dark days are over. I found myself getting spot on people shots (even with closed Asian baby eyes), so I started to trust this camera and experiment more. It rarely let me down, so I really enjoyed reviewing this camera.

Click here for part II, where I’ll do some bookshelf tests and share my final thoughts. I’ll also compare it to the Sony a6300 which I had initially thought would blow this camera away.

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order the X-Pro 2 on the B&H web site, or click here to purchase the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Lens.

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Friday, May 16, 2014

REVIEW: Nikon D4s-Real World AF Miracle Shots and ISO 409,600 from a Canon 1D X Shooter (Part III)

Nikon D4S DSLR Camera (Top View)

The first two parts of this series are here:

Typically when I review products I don’t do a series unless I’m comparing a group of similar products against each other, but this is different. This is a very special product that changes the game for photography and what our expectations are about keeper rates. I’ve shot 3000 photos* with this camera up to this point and it’s become painfully obvious to me, a Canon 1D X owner, that this truly is the best autofocus system I have ever tested. It’s not because it does things that the 1D X can’t, but rather it does it without me having to help the camera with its decisions (as is required by the Canon AF system). The net result is that I can focus on the creative aspect of photography because this camera will rarely miss a shot – even in the most difficult scenarios.

I thought the D4 was a joke as I had better luck with the D3s I had used in the past, so apparently that “s” moniker on Nikon D series bodies means “super” – because that’s just what this camera is. Yes, I’m a Canon 1D X shooter, but I’m a D4s fan boy too – because it’s earned that right based on the results I got with everything I threw at it.

Boys and girls, this is one bad a$$ camera that will not disappoint when it comes to autofocus – that’s for certain based on what I’ve seen!

* = CORRECTION: Previously I had mistakenly said 6000, but I double counted due to shooting RAW+JPEG during my testing.

About this article

In this installment all of the images featured in this article are straight out of the camera with ZERO post processing. They are the original in-camera JPEG images that have been renamed by Lightroom but not modified in any other way.

I have intentionally taken them in everyday life scenarios without any staging or special tricks to show you results that you can expect if you were using this product. What you see is literally what you get. This isn’t about art, it’s about showing you what this product can do in tough situations that you’ll find in both everyday life and on the job. If you know how cameras work you’ll appreciate the complexity of what this camera accomplishes to get the featured shots.

To see a full gallery of shots for this series, visit http://photos.ronmartblog.com/nikon/d4s.

Obstacles

Without question, one of my most beloved features of this camera is its ability to lock on to your subject and not get tripped up by obstacles that prevent the AF system from full seeing your subject. My 1D X has settings that allow you to do this, but you have to know what type of challenges you are going to face and dial in the right AF Servo mode. The D4s just does it without any user intervention which is a much more flexible solution.

In this section I have a bunch of throw away shots that clearly demonstrate scenarios where the AF system chose the right target against all odds. When I tested the D4 it failed 100% of the time on this class of scenarios, but the D4s just nailed it without any input from me beyond a single AF point that I used to track the subject (which was NEVER, EVER the center focus point).

It was so good that I went overboard in the number of shots that I show here, but I can’t help but show the success stories because it’s often the shot after these that’s the hero shot. If the AF system fails on this shot then the odds are almost nil that it will recover for that hero scenario right after. As a result, this camera makes you look like an focus guru who has been shooting sports for decades.

f/2.8 @ 200 mm, 1/400, ISO 160, No Flash
That blur you see is a crapload of bushes completely obscuring my view of my son running through the forest, yet for these (and others in the gallery) it never lost track of him

f/2.8 @ 195 mm, 1/400, ISO 200, No Flash
Paparazzi are going to love this camera because my wife through her hands up out of nowhere here and the D4s didn’t miss a beat – it stayed locked on to her face as I wanted it to do

f/8 @ 185 mm, 1/400, ISO 1800, No Flash
This was a WTF, you’ve gotta be kidding me shot. I was just messing around and following my son on the escalator from quite a distance. I was already happy that it was tracking him on a moving escalator through glass, but when this blown glass came into play I full expected to lose him. It never did so this is where I started to get sad at the thought of returning this camera after my review!

f/2.8 @ 50 mm, 1/200, ISO 6400, No Flash
Like above, Kai’s had just flew up from the table unexpectedly but even with the 50mm prime it stayed locked on.

f/2.8 @ 70 mm, 1/1600, ISO 2000, No Flash
This was a shot I wasn’t ready for so when my son poked his head through I just raised the camera and started firing. The first frame was a miss, but everything after that was dead on.

f/2.8 @ 175 mm, 1/2500, ISO 100, No Flash
When you track kids through the playground there’s always poles getting in the way but I was amazed at how often the D4s simply ignored them and continued to stay locked on to the correct subject.

f/2.8 @ 200 mm, 1/1000, ISO 100, No Flash
So many things to lock on, but again it didn’t trip up. Group focus points probably would have, but I quickly discovered that single point (no matter which point you used) was the way to go.

f/2.8 @ 200 mm, 1/400, ISO 140, No Flash
Are you kidding me? I’m no rock star at keeping my AF point locked on a kid running an unpredictable pattern through the woods with tons of obstacles, but you’d never know that by looking at the series of shots it nailed under impossible conditions.

There are more in the gallery, but there are also MANY from the 6000 shots I took with this camera that prove obstacles are indeed no obstacle for this camera. Wildlife, Paparazzi, Event and Parent photographers are going to love, love, love this autofocus system. Just put it on single AF point and AF-C and magic happens.

While my 1D X can do this well, I have to be set up in the right mode to let my camera know that this is what I expect to do. It doesn’t just do it by default and making that choice means I’ll get these but miss others that the D4s would just nail without user intervention. When it comes to obstacles, the D4s is the hands down champion of this generation of cameras.

Multiple Subjects

Like obstacles, there are things that happen during the course of shooting that can trip a camera up. Most often it is when another person appears in the scene because there’s probably some face detection algorithm which decides who to focus on. In my testing I gave the D4s the ultimate test with my son swinging and he tilted his head where his face was no longer visible at the same time a new subject entered the scene. No camera I’ve ever tested before this would have got this shot right, but the D4s knew my son on the swing was the subject. It never let itself get tripped up by all the distractions here which is exactly what I wanted.

f/2.8 @ 85 mm, 1/1600, ISO 400, No Flash
I’ve put 101 shots from this swing series in the gallery here so you can see how it just stayed locked on and did the right thing.

f/2.8 @ 70 mm, 1/320, ISO 2000, No Flash
My subject is the boy with the blue shirt and despite all of the distractions it stays locked on to my intended subject.

f/3.2 @ 200 mm, 1/320, ISO 6400, No Flash
My shutter speed was too low (user error), but this lady stepped out in front of me and the D4s never faltered. It stayed locked on to my subject for the shots before and after this.

Kites

Kites are tough because they can be unpredictable and the background distractions can be brutal. For this series I chose to go with the group AF points because I didn’t feel I stood a chance keeping a single AF point on this subject. The winds were strong so it was taking lots of unexpected turns and dives, yet most shots were spot on.

f/3.2 @ 200 mm, 1/800, ISO 100, No Flash
I laughed out loud with this shot because I thought – you’ve gotta be kidding me. How the hell did it get the right subject – especially when it’s using a cluster of AF points?!!! This is why some have made bold claims that this AF system reads your mind. This is pretty damn close to that!

f/3.2 @ 200 mm, 1/800, ISO 100, No Flash
In group AF mode it generally does a good job of making choices as to what is the subject and what’s noise to ignore.

f/3.2 @ 200 mm, 1/1250, ISO 100, No Flash
However, group AF mode has a higher tendency to get confused for a frame here and there. Surprisingly it often refocuses back on the correct subject in the next frame.

f/3.2 @ 200 mm, 1/3200, ISO 100, No Flash
Focus remains spot on for nearly all of my kite shooting, but I had my fair share of shots where the exposure was off by 1/3rd to 2/3rd of a stop. This is one area where I still think Canon is significantly stronger, but if you shoot RAW this isn’t a showstopper issue. If you shoot JPEG only then you’ll constantly fight this problem – but it is MUCH better in the D4s than the D4.

After my kite test I once again found myself amazed and happy with the results. If someone paid me to shoot a kite festival I’d probably rent a D4s if I had to because it’s definitely the best tool for the job.

Slides

Slides shots are fun but they are tough to nail because kids move fast and the slides are often steep and short. Despite our super fast burst modes, it’s not uncommon to only have a keeper here and there after a days worth of shooting slides.

f/2.8 @ 70 mm, 1/1600, ISO 400, No Flash
This is one of a series of 14 shots that represent the extreme accuracy I was getting on slides like this during my entire shooting time.

f/2.8 @ 70 mm, 1/1000, ISO 100, No Flash
After a kid finishes sliding it’s often “off to the races” to the next activity, so if you were lucky enough to get a single nice slide shot, you’ll lose them immediately after they get off the slide. The D4s seemed to have the same carefree attitude as my son and demanded – “done, what’s next”? I was superbly impressed!

f/2.8 @ 180 mm, 1/500, ISO 100, No Flash	f/2.8 @ 180 mm, 1/640, ISO 100, No Flash
f/2.8 @ 180 mm, 1/640, ISO 100, No Flash	f/2.8 @ 180 mm, 1/640, ISO 100, No Flash

Spiral slides are one of the toughest because your subject appears out of nowhere for a split second and then you are done. In this series I used group AF points and it failed for one but recovered and got the rest. I ended up with two keepers and three that I could use which is a lot more than I’m accustomed to with most cameras. My 1D X can do this too, but this is the first Nikon I’ve used that was this reliable in this scenario. If I would have used a single AF point I probably would have got every shot in focus had I been at the right spot and released the shutter right for the first frame above.

Swing Test

Shooting subjects on swings are super tough because AF systems like a predictable pattern. They can detect that an object is traveling and then use offsets to keep the AF tracking properly, but swings mess that all up by going back and forth often with little to no pause in the transition period. Of the several hundred shots I took for this test only a few of those transition points failed to focus, but everything else was a keeper.

I’ve put 101 shots from this swing series in the gallery here so you can see a couple sample sets exactly as they came out of the camera – distractions and all. No shots have been eliminated from the set.

f/2.8 @ 85 mm, 1/1600, ISO 500, No Flash
Minimum focus distance issues can be a problem, but usually your nemesis for shots like these is when you transition from forward to backwards.The D4s didn’t have a problem there but if I used group auto focus points it would have what felt like a random blurry shot. The rest were great, so for this series of 101, I used a single AF point for the best results.

f/2.8 @ 85 mm, 1/1600, ISO 500, No Flash
Despite the thunder of the D4s, people still managed to get in my shot, so the AF system had to work very hard here but it kept doing its job by staying laser focused on my son.

f/2.8 @ 85 mm, 1/1600, ISO 500, No Flash
Surprisingly transitions weren’t the problem that they typically can be.

This was a spectacular test with unreal results. I looked at the D4s and literally told it – I’m buying you if I win the lottery. I didn’t, but like most of the people reading this – we can dream right?!!!!

School Gym Event

The gym I tested on this particular day was actually lit much better than the average school gym. School gyms can be torture tests because you have nasty color light in dark conditions and often are there to take photos of fast moving subjects. The net result is often high ISO shots that still end up being blurry because you are afraid to push your ISO to its limits. On this day I only had to go to ISO 10000, which the D4s does just fine. Any problems I had this particular day were user error (like the wrong white balance and the occasional distraction which caused me to point to the wrong subject).

f/2.8 @ 200 mm, 1/200, ISO 1250, No Flash
It was nice to pick out my son in the crowd and get a clear shot. This type of shot with a single AF point was never a problem.

f/3.2 @ 70 mm, 1/320, ISO 2000, No Flash
This was fast moving, but I prepared in advance by doing test shots on the cracker before the fast moving action got this scene. Despite this, about 50% were total AF fails, but the burst mode was good enough to get enough shots that I was still able to get a few keepers.

f/2.8 @ 190 mm, 1/200, ISO 1250, No Flash
The D4s didn’t need practice, but I did. I wanted to make sure I knew where to put my single AF point when the action made its way to this stage of the race.

f/2.8 @ 175 mm, 1/320, ISO 2200, No Flash
It was nice to see that my biggest errors were my own in shutter speed and white balance choices. Those are problems I can fix on the spot, but a camera that can’t focus is far more frustrating. Fortunately that was rarely the case with the D4s.

f/2.8 @ 70 mm, 1/640, ISO 10000, No Flash
The tug of war meant a higher ISO and a lot of distractions, but I was confident by this point that I just needed to boost my shutter speed and put an AF point on my son and the D4s would do the rest. It did – without fail.

Not pictured here was group indoor jump rope which was a pretty big challenge, but the D4s rose to the occasion for it as well.

I wish I could have tested in a darker gym that more closely represents most peoples reality, but alas I didn’t get a chance to do that. I don’t think the AF system cares, but I was curious to see what those real life challenges would look like.

Around the House

f/2.8 @ 200 mm, 1/320, ISO 1600, No Flash
It was only a few years ago where ISO 1600 was feared and loathed by many photography curmudgeons, but it’s as good as ISO 200 was on many of those cameras. These are good times in the world of photography!

f/4 @ 105 mm, 1/320, ISO 1800, No Flash
Even with Auto White Balance set to the warmer Auto2 setting, I found that the images are still typical Nikon green (those background walls are beige). This is an area where I much prefer Canon, but again it’s only a problem if you are shooting JPEG only.

f/10 @ 70 mm, 1/8000, ISO 409,600, No Flash
Only MythBusters is going to use this ISO, but it’s there if you want to capture paranormal activity.

f/7.1 @ 70 mm, 1/4000, ISO 102,400, No Flash
While not great, at this tiny resolution and compared to above this looks stellar. Click the image to see the original to learn that this isn’t an ISO you’ll really want to use often, but it doesn’t suck like 409,600.

f/7.1 @ 70 mm, 1/640, ISO 25600, No Flash
ISO 25,600 is very usable and feels spectacular after looking at the shots above, so that opens up lots of options in tough conditions like the 1/640 sec shutter speed shown here at f/7.1 in very dim light – that’s awesome!

f/2.8 @ 200 mm, 1/400, ISO 10000, No Flash
This feels like a normal natural light shot until you look at the ISO, so there’s no reason to fear higher ISO’s with this camera – that’s its job.

f/2.8 @ 50 mm, 1/200, ISO 5000, No Flash
I found myself trying to compensate for the green and overdoing the red, so I was wishing I would have used my ExpoDisc more for the sample shots.

I once declared the 5D Mark III as the ultimate parents camera, and it’s still a good choice, but both the D4s and 1D X offer a whole new level of performance that consumers cameras can’t compete with. Yes, you pay the price so few parents could possibly afford it, but perhaps tech savvy well-to-do grandparents will!

Gymnastics

Sadly I can’t publish my 850+ gymnastic shots, but for those who are interested I can say that the results are in check with everything you’ve seen here. Group AF causes the random miss and focus on the background subjects, but single point was bang on. The high ISO performance meant I could just leave it on Auto ISO and set my desired settings in manual mode. As a result, I had the shutter speed I needed and the AF system did a superlative job getting 98%+ of the shots in perfect focus – even when there were distractions.

I HIGHLY recommend this camera if you have to shoot indoor sports like gymnastics, basketball, volleyball, etc…