Showing posts with label R3000. Show all posts
Showing posts with label R3000. Show all posts

Thursday, December 3, 2015

REVIEW: Epson SureColor P800 vs P600, 3880 & 4900 – Part I

Epson SureColor P800
Epson SureColor P800

The Epson StylusPro 3880 has been an extremely popular fine art photo printer with legions of  fans online, so in some ways you can understand why Epson didn’t’ seem to be in a rush to replace it. However, 3880 users had to suffer with the lack of industry standard features like wireless printing, AirPrint, CloudPrint, and a modern color touch control panel that have become common place in the market. In fact, it always killed me when I would see lesser printers like the R3000 with all these great features and think – why doesn’t Epson just update the 3880 with all of this goodness?!!! I know I wasn’t alone in this thinking, so the arrival of this printer is one that has been eagerly anticipated for years – and very long overdue!

I had my first chance to check one out this past March in a private screening with Epson along with the P600, and I was thrilled with delight – but I could tell no one. As a result, this is a review that I’ve been eager to do for 9 months now as I’m extremely pleased to share my excitement about how happy I am with the P800.

Check out my unboxing article (which shows the media adapter) if you haven’t already, then come back here to learn more.

Setup

I’ve already reviewed the P600 and loved it. Since there are so many similarities between the P600 and P800, I’d ask you to read my P600 review for the basics of what I love about this printer. This review will pick up with where that one leaves off and discuss features and observations that are unique to the P800 and how it compares with both other Epson printers.

P600 vs P800 Physical Differences

Epson SureColor P600 Inkjet Printer
Epson SureColor P600 Inkjet Printer

The P600 was my go to printer for household printing needs until the P800 arrived. At first I thought I’d keep the P600 in service for that duty, but I quickly realized that wasn’t necessary. The P800 was just as easy to setup, use and let family members use. However, it had the benefit of more cost effective prints thanks to larger ink cartridges and better print results.


P600 (top) and P800 (bottom) - Externally they are nearly identical with a slight size difference

The biggest difference between the P600 and P800 is that you can only do 13” wide prints from P600 whereas the P800 handles up to 17” wide. This is a big deal for fine art printing as that allows for prints at 360 pixels per inch (ppi) from high resolution cameras like the Canon 5DsR, Sony A7R Mark II and D810 without resizing for the best possible print quality.

P600 (left) vs P800 (right) Ink Cartridges
P600 25.9 ml (left) vs P800 64 ml (right) Starter Ink Cartridges

While both printers use the new Epson UltraChrome HD Ink , another critically important difference is the size of the ink cartridges. The P600 only uses 24.9ml which will meet the casual printers needs, but the cost per ml is around $1.25. The P800 comes with starter 64ml cartridges, but actually uses 80ml for the refills. The larger cartridges mean a cost per ml of around $0.69 cents at the time this was written, so that means the cost per print is about 2x for the P600. Clearly, if you are doing a lot of printing the P800 is definitely going to have a lower cost of ownership!

P600 Overhead View - Cover Open
P600 Overhead View - Cover Open

The P600 inks load from the top, and the print head house seems different externally but you can’t see the head itself. My Epson contacts say the actual Micro Piezo AMC print head is identical, so in theory the prints should be identical since they both also use the same ink but the P600 boasts a maximum resolution of 5760 x 1440 dpi whereas the P800 has a maximum of 2880 x 1440 dpi.


P800 Overhead View - Cover Open while printing

Given my past history testing printers, I’m confident that mere mortals will never be able to tell the difference between the actual print resolution of the two printers. My source that works at the print head driver level on a popular RIP for Epson printers tells me that the P800 appears to have the superior print head and that from his perspective the two are engineered very differently in terms of how they lay down ink. As a result, he’s had to write separate drivers for the two printers which suggests they may not share as much at the print head as they do on the outer case design.


P600 shiny plastic top scratches and smears easily

One thing I didn’t notice until I moved my P600 for this review was how many scratches and smears built up on top of the shiny front panel. This was pretty disappointing, but fortunately it isn’t a problem with the P800 as it doesn’t use any shiny plastic like this on top.

At the end of the day the P600 is a great printer, but IF you can afford to get the P800 then definitely do it. It’s more cost effective to operate and more durable.

For more information, see the Detailed Specs tab for the P800 here and the Specifications tab for the P600 here on Epson’s website.

P800 vs 3880 Physical Differences


P800 (bottom) vs 3880 (top)

Weight and size wise the P800 is about the same as the 3880 which means a foot print that allows you to put the P800 where your 3880 once was – IF you don’t use the optional roll media adapter sold separately (see more later in this article).

There’s really no advantage that I’ve found thus far with the 3880 beyond the fact that it has some the best ICC profiles of any printer on the market. A good ICC profile is critical to making a good print, so it will take time before the P800 catches up here. As a result, if you are upgrading you might want to hang on to your 3880 until you are satisfied with the paper profiles of all your favorite papers. If you generate your own profiles, then I can see no reason for not upgrading.

P800 vs 4900

Epson Stylus Pro 4900 Inkjet Printer
Epson Stylus Pro 4900 Inkjet Printer

Utter the words Epson Stylus Pro 4900 to many owners who didn’t print on it very often (likely at least every other day) and you are very likely to hear a string of bad words about the problems with the print heads clogging on this printer. While it has massive 200ml ink cartridges, you probably waste half of that each year doing power cleanings trying to unclog the heads – a frustration both in time and costs.

My sources all point to the Advanced MicroPiezo TFP print head design specific to the 4900 as being the culprit for the head clogging, so Epson took the safe route and decided to have the P800 use the same MicroPiezo print head from the 3880. The 3880 was well known to rarely clog and even when it did it could typically be corrected with one power cleaning, so this was wonderful news to me.

My 4900 died an untimely death due to print head clogging issues, so I didn’t have it on hand to test with for this review. However, I can say from experience that when its heads aren’t clogged the 4900 is a wonderful heavy duty printer that is quiet and supports big print jobs – especially useful to school/sports, portrait and wedding photographers doing a large number of sheets. If you have one for those purposes, then stick with it as the P800 is still optimized for a small number of sheets at a time. Given what I’m seeing with the new SureColor series improvements, I’d suspect a 4900 replacement is on the way next year so large volume print masters should hold out for that to get the heavy duty support.

If you only use the 4900 for proper roll support and you didn’t really utilize the large sheet tray then you might want to consider getting a P800.  To the untrained eye, many will find the print quality to be similar enough and the wireless features make it a welcome household addition. In addition it’s much lighter with a smaller footprint so if you are like me you’ll appreciate reclaiming some space in your studio back!

Ink

Epson T850 UltraChrome HD 80ml Ink Cartridges
Epson T850 UltraChrome HD 80ml Ink Cartridges

Owners of existing Epson printers, including 3880 owners, will need to get new ink as the Epson UltraChrome K3 9-Cartridge Ink Set has been improved with the new Epson T850 UltraChrome HD 9-Ink Cartridge Set that has roughly the same street price. Loading is similar to the 3880 but now the LCD features a touch screen button to open the door:


P800 Ink Cartridges front load with a door that opens via the touch panel LCD button

Sadly Epson chose to ship the printer with 64ml ink cartridges instead of the standard 80ml, so your first set will run out much faster than your refills. That said, 64ml is still a lot of ink so average users could still find themselves going many months or even a a year before they need to replace these cartridges, so don’t let the internet trolls stress you out too much about this. For many this decision, which means a cheaper printer cost, was a wise one even if everyone would feel better if they were all topped off. That 144ml (16 ml * 9 cartridges) is roughly $100 worth of ink, so the price difference is significant enough to justify it – even it is annoying.

The Dreaded Ink Swap Issue

It is with great disappointment and frustration that Epson still chooses to require the Photo Black and Matte Black inks to use the same line, therefore requiring a line purge and recharge each time you switch between the two inks. While this process is automated, it still takes 3 minutes and 30 seconds and 4.6ml (~$3+) to switch from Matte to Photo Black and 2 minutes 30 seconds and 1.6ml (~$1.10) to go back from Photo Black to Matte. This is a lot of wasted time and money, and Canon has proved this is necessary by designing a printer with dedicated lines for both.

My Epson contacts still claim this is for our benefit and a superior design to Canon, but in this respect I call BS. Given how much that has been reengineered for this printer, I tend to share the opinion of the web trolls as to why this “feature” still exists.

If this is a new revelation to you then my advice is to just do your ink swaps carefully (meaning batch up your matte and photo black jobs to minimize swaps) as it is tedious and expensive if you don’t.

Roll Support

P800vsP600-Roll4 P600 Roll Adapter (top) vs
Epson Roll Media Adapter for SureColor P800 (bottom)

Of course the big news about the P800 is that it now properly supports rolls, albeit via an optional roll media adapter sold separately. This means this printer ends up becoming not only a replacement for the 3880, but many people will likely replace their 4900 for this smaller and more modern solution. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of R3000 owners upgraded to this model as well.

The good news is that this is legitimate roll printing support with the same kind of spindle you’d see on a 4900, but sadly it does lack the helpful dust cover so you’ll want to keep your printer covered or remove the roll when not in use to avoid getting dust on your roll media.

It features the standard adapters to support both 2” and 3” core rolls up to 100 feet long, so you can use “real” rolls of paper instead of the small 20’ rolls used by the P600 and R3000. This is also a solid hunk of metal so it’s very stable, and it installs in seconds with no tools. I think people who print rolls will be very pleased with everything except the reality that there’s no dust cover.

Where this really becomes important is when printing canvas because if you’ve ever tried to load sheet canvas you know that copious amounts of bad words are required before you finally get it right. What's more you end up with such a small canvas after wrapping that it really wasn’t worth the effort. Now you can print banner size canvases if you like with the only limitation being the 17” width of the roll.

Here’s a 17x22 print I did on Epson Canvas Natural Satin that took about 12 minutes to print at the maximum resolution (in line with Epson’s estimates):


Epson SureColor P800
printing from a roll of Epson Exhibition Canvas

If you decide to put your P800 where your 3880 once lived then you’ll need an extra 9 inches of depth to accommodate this adapter.

See my review of Exhibition Canvas Natural Gloss where I print from the P600 roll adapter to see how you can also print and gallery wrap a canvas.

Printer Driver remains the same

Anyone who has printed with Epson drivers on Windows will no doubt be at home with the P800 driver – it’s the standard stuff you see on all Epson pro printers as you can see below for the Windows version:

Epson's Print Driver UI for Windows
Epson's Print Driver UI for Windows

Page Layout for Windows
Page Layout for Windows

The same is true for the Mac on OS X Yosemite as well:

Screen Shot 2015-12-03 at 2.13.06 AM

See my Printing Series paper reviews (i.e., Exhibition Fiber, Exhibition Canvas Natural Gloss, Advanced Black & White, etc…)  details on how to do this for the P800 or the latest version Lightroom and Photoshop for the Mac and PC.

Consumer Friendliness with Excellent Results

One of the nice new features with this printer (and the P600) is that when you drop in a sheet of paper the touch screen panel automatically prompts you to select the size and paper type. This is important because it tells your personal devices what type of paper is loaded. It was easy to show my 13 year old daughter and wife how to print their own borderless 4x6 prints – which freed me from that burden!

Google CloudPrint, iOS 9 AirPrint,  and Epson iPrint

AirPrint from iOS 9
AirPrint from iOS 9

While none of these print methods are suitable for fine art printing, it’s awesome to be able to keep a pack of Epson Premium Photo Paper Glossy 4x6 sheets on the printer so anyone in the family can get a quick print. It wasn’t long ago when I had to keep a separate cheap printer around to do this, so it’s been a real delight to have the whole family using the one printer. Ironically it’s a lot more cost effective too because the cost per ml on some of those cheap $99 printers ends up being more than what I pay for ink in my P800 ink!

I had no problems getting CloudPrint to work, although you do have to be physically present near the printer to touch a confirmation on the LCD.

AirPrint was even easier and it just worked. It’s only caveat is that you have to load the paper first so that it knows what size print you want, otherwise it assumes the wrong size. Unfortunately the the borderless cropping is pretty aggressive, so if you want to avoid that then I’d suggest using Epson’s iPrint instead.

Epson iPrint Home Screen
Epson iPrint Home Screen

I was pleased with the wealth of options from the home page, but what really impressed me was the maintenance features that were available (disabled below because I was printing):

Epson iPrint is great for homes without a laptop or desktop computer
Epson iPrint is great for homes without a laptop or desktop computer

While there’s no ICC profile support and other advanced features you’d use for fine art printing, the folks that want a little more control over their print job will be pleased with these options:

Printing offers most of the features you need to get the best results
Printing offers most of the features you need to get the best results

The status information was fairly accurate so it was nice to have an app that just works beautifully with no hassle:

Epson iPrint just works!
Epson iPrint just works!

The excellent wireless and front panel touch screen features were long overdue, so I’ve been extremely happy with the usability of this printer.

Additional Thoughts

It seems slightly noisier than the 4990, but more quiet than the 3880 and P600.

It’s a reasonably fast and quiet printer that is big, but still doable on a well built desk. I’ve also used printers on the floor before too, and aside from having to protect the printer from dust it works just fine. 

II still need to do my long-term advanced testing, but thus far I’m seeing excellent print quality when paired with an excellent ICC profile. As a result, I think that should please even the most picky print masters.

The 3880 has a wealth of phenomenally good ICC profiles, so it will take the P800 to catch up in this respect. Using a lower quality ICC profile with any printer will result in lower quality results. As a result, some may scoff and suggest that the 3880 is better with certain papers, but the reality is that with a true apples to apples comparison users should be very pleased with the P800. (NOTE: No, you can’t use your 3880 profiles with the P800 as it’s a different ink set)

Conclusion

I’ll write more on print quality comparisons in my next long-term installment in 2016, but I’ve already seen enough to highly recommend the Epson SureColor P800. This is the printer we have all been waiting for and I’m pleased to say it was worth the wait. I absolutely love it!

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order the P800 at B&H. My friends at Amazon have it available here.

NOTE: Until December 31, 2015 there’s a $300 instant rebate so if you are looking to pick one up then definitely do it this year! Don’t forget, if you have a photography business this is a business expense, so it helps you on your taxes as well!

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Saturday, November 1, 2014

REVIEW: Epson Metallic Photo Paper Glossy & Luster

Epson Metallic Glossy & Luster Photo Papers
Epson Metallic Glossy & Luster Photo Papers

I’m delighted to finally get a chance to bring you my review of Epson Metallic Glossy & Luster Photo Papers. This blog was made famous in the printing community for my previous metallic papers reviews, and I had been encouraging Epson for years to develop a metallic paper. Epson also surprised me by not only doing a traditional glossy metallic but also introducing a luster metallic paper. I’m a huge fan of the Epson Ultra Premium Luster and an ever bigger fan of metallic, so the marriage between the two is more than a dream come true!

Impressions

When I did my last metallic paper comparison, I loved Red River Polar Pearl Metallic and felt it was the winner on price but identical in quality to the Lexjet. As a result of the price advantage, the Red River has been my paper of choice for the last 2+ years and it even had a short run in an incredible 300gsm version (now discontinued) that is still my most favorite ever! As a result, when it comes to glossy metallic, Red River Polar Pearl is the standard by which others are judged.

Glossy

When I flop the papers around in my hands, I notice that the Epson Glossy Metallic seems to have less flex in it – which is great, because that’s the only gripe I have about the Red River (which is what the 300gsm fixed). The color of the Epson seems to be slightly warmer when viewed under a GTI light box, but other than that they are very similar. The amount metallic flake (for lack of a better term) in both papers seems to be about the same, and in my testing the printed results when using the superior Red River ICC profile on both papers surprisingly resulted in the Epson having a slightly cooler temperature image. The cost of the papers currently gives Epson the slight advantage, but if you use my discount coupon code for Red River papers then the Polar Pearl is slightly cheaper.

Luster (or Lustre)

Regardless of how you spell Luster, the Epson Luster Metallic is the first of its kind to come into my studio. I was absolutely THRILLED to find out that Epson had done a luster version because I prefer luster over glossy by a large margin.

As you would hope, the Epson metallic luster has what appears to be an identical luster texture and pattern to the ultra premium luster yet the color is slightly brighter for the ultra premium. The metallic characteristics of this new luster metallic are exactly what I would have hoped for, so I was very satisfied to see that it is a true metallic.

Again I had ICC profile issues, but overall I found the DMax and quality of the print to be very good. In the end I would strongly recommend this paper for anyone who loves metallic but would prefer to print on luster instead of glossy papers.

Compared to Red River & LexJet Metallics

When it comes to luster metallic, there’s only one game in town for me – Epson. However, when it comes to glossy metallic I still prefer the Red River Polar Pearl as my go to paper. My opinion could change if Epson improves its paper profiles, but given what I used during my testing I found the Polar Pearl to have deeper blacks and a more faithful color matching to what I saw on my color calibrated screen (when viewing the prints in a GTI lightbox).

ICC Profiles need work

I downloaded my ICC profiles for my 3880 from http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Pro/ICCProfilesAll.do on November 1, 2014. At that point in time, I felt disappointed with the quality of the ICC profiles provided by Epson. This is rare as they are famous for making brilliant ICC profiles, so hopefully they will do an update in the future. In the meantime, if you can generate your own ICC profiles I’d recommend that you do. You may also find that using the non-metallic equivalent Epson profiles might yield more satisfying results than the actual metallic profiles – however, I strongly discourage that practice unless you have no option. If you don’t mind wasting a little paper and ink, I’d encourage you to do test prints where you print the same part of a image on roughly 1/3rd of the paper with one profile and the same on the other side with the same image and compare the results on the same sheet of paper.

To my eyes the metallic glossy profile generates images that have a cooler color temperature than they should which results in red’s feeling more purple to my eyes. Printing the same identical image with identical settings, but on Red River’s metallic with their profile yielded a perfect print. When printing on the metallic luster and comparing to the ultra premium luster I observed that the metallic print resulted in an image that was too yellow whereas the ultra premium luster was perfect.

I repeated the prints with the metallic papers just to make sure I didn’t make a mistake and got the same identical results, so I’m convinced the problem is the quality of the Epson paper profiles.

Conclusion

My bottom line is that if you are printing metallic and like luster paper over glossy, then definitely get the Epson Metallic Photo Paper Luster – it’s great stuff! Once I get a good paper profile for it (and I’ll make one myself if I must), it’ll probably be my preferred metallic paper. However, if you still like the glossy metallic – which does have a bit more metallic appearance to it – then I’d still recommend the Red River Polar Pearl Metallic over the Epson Metallic Photo Paper Glossy.

If my opinion changes based on future paper profile updates then I’ll be sure to update this article.

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order these papers on the B&H web site. My friends at Amazon have it available here.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

REVIEW: Canon PRO-10 (vs PRO-1 & Epson R3000)

Canon PIXMA PRO-10 Wireless Professional Inkjet Photo Printer
Canon PIXMA PRO-10 Wireless Professional Inkjet Photo Printer

Recently I concluded my review of the PRO-1 with my long-term report where I said:

… make this printer have a smaller footprint, weigh less, add wireless networking and large capacity print tanks. With these issued addressed, I think this could be a compelling choice for people retiring their older Epson printers.

Well the PRO-10 answers all of those requests, except for the larger capacity ink tanks. In fact, this printer is so similar to the PRO-1 that I urge you to read my PRO-1 review for lots of info about features and software that are also featured on this printer.

Setup

imageSNAGHTMLb24f541

SNAGHTMLb257b03

I did a wireless setup with the printer in a separate room from my computer. After installing the disc into my computer I never had to get up to go to the printer as everything “just worked” wirelessly. The R3000 did a great job with this, but the PRO-10 had much better information in the wizards and was overall more suited for normal people versus geeks.

AirPrint just works with no apps
No lame app was needed – native AirPrint just works with the PRO-10

My Epson R3000 requires an app to print from my iOS based devices, but the PRO-10 supported native AirPrint. As a result, I just had to choose the printer from my iOS device (on the same wireless network) and everything “just worked.”

Black & White Performance


Test Image #1

When printing this image as color, I expect the image to have a slightly brown tone to it. The PRO-1’s extra inks prove valuable here as it is able to print this more faithfully to the real color than the PRO-10 can (using identical Canon Luster paper and driver settings). The shadow detail was also much better on the PRO-1 than the PRO-10, so I was a little disappointed in the results from the PRO-10 on this image.

The differences could just be the quality of the ICC profile of the PRO-1 over the PRO-10, but I wouldn’t be happy with this result so I’d have to generate my own profile or choose a different paper with a better profile.

x
Test Image #2

Surprisingly conducting the same exact test with this image (which doesn’t have a color cast) resulted in very similar results on the PRO-1 versus the PRO-10. I was happy with the PRO-10 result.

I’ll do more testing, but for the several other monochrome images I printed without a color cast (printed as color via the driver) I found the PRO-10 to do a good job. The PRO-1 is clearly the better black and white printer, but I wasn’t as concerned with the differences on the second test image as I was with the first.

Color Print Performance

Treehouse
Treehouse

The PRO-1 and PRO-10 both created what appeared to be nearly identical results to my eyes and preferable to results I get from my Epson printers. I loved the results from both and felt no need to tweak the image or reprint as this one was just nailed perfectly on the first try by the PRO-10.

Haruka
Haruka

For this image the PRO-10 was significantly more accurate than the PRO-1 I think because the PRO-10 had a superior color profile in the yellow tones. The PRO-1 version was a little too yellow, but it was identical to the PRO-10 otherwise. Both printers had a little too much black, but it’s something that only I’d notice as I’ve had to print this image hundreds of times for my printing series. I felt that my Epson and large format Canon (i.e., iPF6300 & iPF6450) printers do a better job with this particular image than the PRO series printers, but I suspect that’s due to superior ICC profiles.


New York

For this image I’m looking for tones in the red, and the PRO-10 did a fantastic job as did the PRO-1. The richness and slightly warmer tones actually made me prefer the prints from the Canon printers way more than comparable Epson printers – for this image. The blacks were excellent on this image as well!

4x6 prints straight from my Canon in-camera jpeg’s (with no edits) printed via Lightroom were excellent as well – with no hassle.

Compared to the PRO-1

Canon PIXMA PRO-1
Canon PIXMA PRO-1
(review)

The PRO-1’s ink cost is slightly more than the R3000, but contain more ink so the ink prices for the PRO-10 will be half of the PRO-1. This makes the out of pocket expense when replacing inks cheaper for the PRO-1, but the large capacity inks are always cheaper over time.The PRO-1’s two extra inks also give it a better tonal range.

The PRO-1 is also better suited for thicker paper (like those typically over 380 gsm), but I rarely print on paper that thick and heavy on this size printer (I use the iPF6450) so it’s a non-issue for me.

Software and driver-wise they are identical, so those looking to have multiple printers should find the PRO-10 to be a nice complement to the PRO-1. What’s more the PRO-10’s wireless and AirPrint support make it much more family friendly. Thanks to this feature I actually store my PRO-10 in the laundry room (the former home of my R3000) so that it’s out of the way, but easily accessible to my wife and kids. It’s smaller footprint (compared to the PRO-1) make that possible, and easy wireless setup means that the PRO-10 never has to be connected to a computer (if you have WPS compatible router like my Netgear R6300). AirPrint “just works” from my iOS devices as well which isn’t true of any other device I’ve tested to date.

My advice is that if you are going to be doing more frequent printing for your business then a PRO-1 makes sense, but for personal or family use the PRO-10 is the much better choice.

Compared to the Epson R3000

Epson R3000
Epson R3000
(review)

The R3000 is an outstanding printer that makes gorgeous prints. Its print head technology allows for drops that are half the size which seems to create an advantage over Canon when I carefully inspect prints. However, I have a trained eye and see things that most photographers wouldn’t see - and definitely customers will never see. The R3000 also prints faster than the PRO-10.

What you will see with the Epson is a more finicky printer driver (more on Windows than Mac) and print cartridges that cost twice as much ($31.99 on Nov 2013) as the PRO-10’s ($14.99 on Nov 2013). The R3000 also wastes a lot of ink when switching between photo black and matte black inks which isn’t an issue on the PRO-10 due to dedicated lines for both black inks. As a result, I’m expecting the long-term operating costs of the PRO-10 to be less than the R3000. For the casual printer, these difference could prove to be significant.

As much as I love my R3000, I’ve retired it as my everyday photo printer in favor of the PRO-10 so I can do more exhaustive long-term testing. Check back for my long-term report in 6 to 12 months from this article to see which one wins me over as the better daily printer.

Paper Compatibility

Canon has even made it easy to find information about compatible third party papers and included links to get paper profiles from third parties here. It’s not perfect since some of the third parties don’t direct link to where you need to be, but it’s a good start – especially for the novice printer user.

B&H Screaming Deal (Expires Nov 10, 2013)

You can get one of these printers for as little as $299 until November 10th using the instant and mail-in rebate offers:Canon PRO-10 Rebate Info

Using Bill Me Later you can also get no payments for 6 months, so this is a killer deal if you are in the market for a great photo printer.

Conclusion

The wireless and AirPrint support make this printer a real joy to use not only for me, but also for my family. It’s basically everything I love about the Epson R3000 without any of the hassle (thanks to a superior print driver on Windows and real AirPrint support). It also creates excellent prints that are good enough that almost as good as the PRO-1. As I result, I can say that I am satisfied with the print performance, but like any printer the best icc profiles will be needed to get the best possible results.

This is the perfect personal / family printer that can not only do a great job for your photos, but serve well for your every day jobs (i.e., printing out emails, pdf’s, boarding passes, etc…). It’s tiny inks means it won’t be cheap to operate, but that’s true of every printer in this class (as that’s business model of the industry).

The PRO-10 is a joy to use and features everything I love about the PRO-1 – and more. As a result I can easily say that it is highly recommended for your personal printing needs. For professional printing, I’d still favor the PRO-1, simply due to its larger ink set and support for thicker papers.

Where to order

Click here to order or learn more about the PRO-10 on the B&H web site. My friends at Adorama have it available here.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Getting Great 4x6 Prints Without Any Hassle–Part I of II

Epson R3000 4x6 Borderless Print Settings for Lightroom
Honey, can you “just” make a 4x6 print of this for me?

One of the most dreadful things many photographers today hear from a loved one or friend is “can I just get a 4x6 print of that shot?”. It sounds like a simple request, but reality kicks in when its time to execute that request. Here’s how things typically go down after a request like this:

  1. I don’t have my own printer, so I’ll have to send it off to <insert your print service here>. Doing just one print is pretty expensive because of shipping costs and everything, so I’ll need to add your shot to my next big batch of 4x6 prints (which most photographers these days never bother to do).
  2. I have an awesome professional photo printer, but it can’t do small 4x6 prints very easily. Can I give you a big print instead? No? Crud! Okay let me try to do one for you. Now hours, and sometimes days pass as you fight with your printer to get what ends up being a VERY expensive 4x6 print that you still have to cut so heaven forbid you should screw up that final step! If you get it all right you are usually rewarded with – “hey would you mind doing these <insert large number> images too?”
  3. I normally send my stuff out, but I’ll try to do one for you on my business ink jet printer. <time passes> Okay, here it is – yeah, sorry that the colors are totally wrong and that it’s so dark but that’s the best I can do. This is usually followed up by a comment about how the print doesn’t really feel like a photo like they were expecting, so here’s where you have to admit that your bargain paper kinda sucks, and you warn them to make sure they don’t get it wet because it will get ink on everything.

Responses #2 & #3 usually end up resulting in the print service response in #1 over time because you realize that it’s not cost effective to do #2 and #3 doesn’t make anybody happy.

Having déjà vu yet?

Despite being a print master myself with a lot of experience using both Canon and Epson printers, I found myself dreading the request for a 4x6 print. It was just too small for my equipment, and I didn’t want to waste letter size sheets for a one off print. It always ended up being both a lot of hassle and expense. However my wife, mother-in-law, mom, etc… “just” wanted a 4x6 print right now, so they were baffled why “Mr. Printing Series” couldn’t just give them what they wanted – very quickly.

This scenario was quite embarrassing to be quite honest, and I quickly found that other photographers with large printers had also shared my disdain for the 4x6 print request.

The Solution

When I reviewed the Epson Stylus Photo R3000, I fell in love with how easy it was to use. I quickly requested that Epson send me some 4x6 paper so I could try to see if this was finally my solution to the dreaded 4x6 request.

I’m happy to report that it was. Of course, some might think “no duh”, but it’s funny how many people I’ve talked to who have never printed on QUALITY pre-cut 4x6 paper using a printer that was DESIGNED to to 4x6 prints (especially one that can take more than a couple sheets at a time).

Notice the two words in capitals in that last paragraph. I emphasized those words because many times people who try to do 4x6 will either get cheap 4x6 paper that doesn’t have a good ICC paper profile and results are horrible – even on a great printer. Those who seem to overcome the penny pinching trap often find themselves on a printer that jams if you try to do more than one or two sheets at a time, which again makes the task of printing out a dozen shots of the grandbaby for Mom a huge headache.

This is why I HIGHLY recommend buying a printer like the Epson R3000 and using ONLY Epson paper or the Canon PRO-1/PRO-10 and using ONLY Canon paper. These models come with 1decent paper profiles and printer settings that “just work” to give you very good results directly from Photoshop or Lightroom.

The Papers To Make Your Life Easier

Here are the papers I use most often for my quick 4x6 print jobs with my Epson and Canon printers:

Epson Ultra Premium Glossy Photo Paper - 4x6" - 100 Sheets
Epson Ultra Premium Glossy Photo Paper - 4x6" - 100 Sheets

Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy II (4 x 6") 100 Sheets
Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy II (4 x 6") 100 Sheets

Click here for part II where I show screen shots of my printer settings for both Windows and Mac using Photoshop and Lightroom so you can be sure to get great results.

But Ron, I don’t like glossy prints

You may not like glossy prints, but 99% of the time the person who is requesting 4x6 prints will prefer glossy prints. In fact, if you print glossy and non-glossy, it’s rare to see “normal” people (i.e., non-photographers) not choose the glossy print. If you think you know better, and insist on a less glossy paper then here’s my next best recommendations:

Epson Premium Semi-Gloss Photo Paper for Inkjet 4x6" - 40 Sheets
Epson Premium Semi-Gloss Photo Paper for Inkjet 4x6" - 40 Sheets

Canon SG-201 Photo Paper Plus Semi-Gloss - 4x6" - 50 Sheets
Canon SG-201 Photo Paper Plus Semi-Gloss - 4x6" - 50 Sheets

Neither of these papers from Epson or Canon are as good as their glossy equivalent in my opinion, but these will get the job done with a final print that is closer to a Luster finish.

But, but, but…

Some people love to argue and subject themselves to torture, so it’s not uncommon when I share my 4x6 advice to hear comments like:

  • But the quality of prints on the letter size (and up) papers that I use are better than these… – yep, you are correct – the larger papers offer a better selection of higher quality papers but guess what – the people you’ll typically give a 4x6 print to won’t notice or care.
  • But I can just cut my letter size papers… – ha, ha – yeah, go for it. Let’s see how much you enjoy doing that and how much fun you have trying to get good borderless 4x6 prints. If you factor in your time and the inevitable miscuts, you aren’t really doing yourself any favors here.
  • But Ron, you have a good article on printing a strip of 4x6 prints without wasting paper– yep, I created that out of necessity but the truth is that time wasted and hassle with cutting those isn’t as cost effective.
  • But I already have a big printer, and I can’t fit/afford a small printer too… – this is one of my favorite excuses because anybody who takes self-printing seriously is going to have a big selection of paper and they are going to spend more than the cost of a R3000 or PRO-10 on ink for their larger format photo printer. People who’ve made an investment in a good printer often have very expensive gear, so this excuse is often just that – an excuse.

Conclusion

The ability to quickly and easily do a one off print that pleases your loved one is very satisfying. The instant gratification and lack of hassle make it well worth the investment. It can also be a business expense as you can more easily have your client or model leave your studio with a proof print in hand with very little additional cost to you.

If you haven’t done your own self-printing, then this is a good place to get your toes wet. See my advice on printer shopping and check out my Printing 101 eBook if you want to get started in what I think is the most exciting part of photography!

CLICK HERE for part II where I show screen shots of my printer settings for both Windows and Mac using Photoshop and Lightroom so you can be sure to get great results.

If you must print with a large printer, then here’s a couple articles I highly recommend:

Where to order

Click the links in the article to order the printers (most of which have killer rebates right now) and paper.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Celebrating the Black & White Print

clip_image001

My friend Dan Steinhardt at Epson has informed me that they’ve released a cool new video series called “In Celebration of the Black and White Print”. It features some great black and white workflows using my one of favorite black & white products, Silver Efex Pro (click here for the lowest price on the web) and my everyday printer – the R3000 by Dan and Tony Corbell. It also has some great print master interviews with John Sexton and Kim Weston.

If you love black & white printing, then I’m sure these super high quality video will be an enjoyable use of your time!

For more interesting printing topics, check out my printing series page.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Which Printer Should I Buy? Epson or Canon?

Years ago when I decided to take on the challenge of learning all there is to know about photography printing, I swore that I’d never pick sides. I’d just state my opinions and I saw them and try to encourage people to get their images off their computers and into their hands via printing. I still believe in that mission and still feel strongly that both Epson and Canon make outstanding products.

This article started out as a simple post about Henry Wilhelm’s comments in the next section, but evolved into this long overdue discussion where I put my cards on the table about what I really think. This blog has always been about open and honest feedback like I’d tell a personal friend with no sugar coating or bullshit.

In this article I share my advice based on my daily experience with the 5 professional printers I keep in my studio. I love all of my printers and they all have their strengths and weaknesses, but I realize that my readers can’t afford to own so many so you just need someone to give you the facts as they see them. I hope to accomplish that in this article and hopefully my comments will be taken to heart by both Canon and Epson so they can make their products better.

With that said, let’s stir the pot by referencing a August 3, 2012 Canon video interview with Henry Wilhelm about the history of photography, print permanence, and "the look and feel" of silver-gelatin and inkjet prints. (NOTE: I say good things about Epson later too <g>)

Canon PIXMA Pro-1 Printer – The Best Black & White Printer Ever Made? Henry Wilhelm Thinks So!

PIXMA PRO-1
Canon PIXMA PRO-1 Photo Printer (Adorama, Amazon, and B&H)

Henry Wilhelm is a very well respected name in the photo printing industry. In fact, when I first started doing my printing series I frequently heard my Epson contact reference Henry and his Wilhelm Imaging Research web site as the source for the best and most accurate print permanence ratings. Henry also claims to be an apprentice to Ansel Adams when he was younger, so I took pause when I watched this video where Henry raves about the Black & White performance of the PIXMA PRO-1 printer:

Canon HD video interview with Henry Wilhelm about the history of photography, print permanence, and "the look and feel" of silver-gelatin and inkjet prints  (low bandwidth version)

In this video he states that:

The Canon PIXMA PRO-1 printer which uses the 12-ink LUCIA system with 4 level black gray inks and a clear Chroma optimizer ink is the first printing system that to me has fully solved [the problem of differential gloss]. It produces the most beautiful black and white prints ever made on an ink jet printer.

If Ansel [Adams] were alive today he would absolutely love the PIXMA Pro-1 Printer – I have no doubt about that!

Those are some bold words (and honestly dems fightin’ words :-) in the photo printing community where Epson is the alleged leader of the industry. According to one source, total printer sales put Canon in a higher spot, but that includes lower-end printers and copiers so from what I’ve seen Epson does appear to be the golden standard.

I’ve been singing the praises of my iPF6300 (review) and iPF6450 (review) printers great performance and definitive ease of use over the 7900 (and definitely over the clog prone 4900). However, the Epson fanboys would have me tarred and feathered for speaking such blasphemy!

The truth of the matter is that I do still agree that Epson and Canon both make very, very good products. I also think that in the photography community Canon’s are highly underrated and Epson’s are very much overrated. In addition, while I much prefer the Epson HDR and Canon LUCIA EX inks over the Canon LUCIA inks, the Wilhelm Print Permanence Ratings for the Canon Pro-1 Printer with Canon LUCIA Pigment Inks is convincing data that proves you can trust these inks. In fact, my own independent “rain test” of the LUCIA EX convinced me that these aren’t your ordinary consumer printer inks! However, what sealed the deal was this report:

CANON iPF8300 with LUCIA EX Pigment Inks and CANON Media Receives High Permanence Ratings (Report) From Wilhelm Imaging Research (Press Release)

It should be noted that the iPF6400, iPF6450, iPF8400 and iPF9400 (and their predecessors the iPF6300, iPF6350, and iPF8300) all use the same exact ink and print head technology, but the image quality has improved in the newer models (see my comparison). This means that you can expect the same permanence ratings when paired with the same paper used in the test.

SIDEBAR: Canon PRO-1000 Review coming in 2016

Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 17" Professional Photographic Inkjet Printer
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 17" Professional Photographic Inkjet Printer

As of December 2015, I’m being told that Canon is working to get me a review unit of this printer but I haven’t been able to test it yet. I have high hopes as on paper it address most of the shortcomings I had with the PRO-1 (which made fantastic prints) . With improved inks now in 80ml cartridges, this could give the P800 a run for its money. Stay tuned!

What does all this mean?

It means don’t buy into the Internet malarkey that Epson printers are superior to Canon. They aren’t. Sure if you pixel peep various images you can create results where one printer shines over the other – especially if you use third party printing software like ColorByte ImagePrint with Epson printers – you can find that Epson printers perform very well. However, if you get Canon print masters together than can show similar examples where the Canon’s come out on top. In my own testing the screening technology of the Epson’s do seem to have an advantage, but the new LUCIA EX based Canon printers released last year close that gap. The PRO-1 certainly has outstanding screening technology as well!

The Canon printers using LUCIA and LUCIA EX inks are excellent printers, so don’t let the naysayers scare you away. I’m not as fond of the cheaper printers that use the cheapo ChromaLife 100+ inks though, so keep in mind that all printers aren’t equal. In fact, even Epson has this problem with its cheap dye inks (i.e., Claria® Hi-Definition).

Does this mean Epson printers aren’t any good?

Heck no! In fact, one huge advantage that Epson has is its HUGE fan base that has created some of the best ICC Profiles for photo printing. Printers like the Epson Stylus® Pro 3880 have no end of brilliant paper profiles for nearly every paper, so when used properly that will guarantee great results! My own testing with the new Epson Stylus® Photo R3000 also showed that it’s superior head technology gave better print results than the 3880 and was near identically to the much larger and more expensive Epson Stylus® Pro 4900! So there’s lots of great Epson printers to choose from, and their Advanced Black & White mode when used with Epson Exhibition Fiber (and other Epson Signature Worthy Papers) will create jaw dropping black and white (as well as color) prints.

UPDATE: I’m in long-term testing with the P600 and P800, and both are very good printers that are significantly better than the R3000 & 3880 (respectively) that they replace. While they are too new to have great ICC profile support – yet – that will inevitably come over the next year as 3880 and 4900 owners are moving to these printers at a rapid pace.

Ron, just tell me which one you like best!

Epson SureColor P800
Epson SureColor P800 (B&H and Amazon)

I wish I could, but this is like comparing Nikon to Canon cameras – again, both are great products but there’s a lot of variables that come into play when deciding which is right for you. The same holds true here. The Canon PRO-10 and Epson SureColor P600 are the best starter printers on the market and they are sure to make you fall in love instantly! The Epson SureColor P800 kicks it up a notch to give you pro performance without the massive footprint of the 4900. Canon’s new imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 is very likely going to be a great alternative to the P800, so it’s a great time for printing!

I can also state, without hesitation, that I think the Canon LUCIA/LUCIA EX models and Epson K3™/UltraChrome HDR models are the best photographic printers on the market – PERIOD! I do find the Canon printers to be MUCH easier to use and I’ve never had any clogging problems (whereas I can’t use the 4900 without spending 30 minutes addressing clogging problems).

In addition, as I stated earlier, I think Epson has the advantage in both screening technology and availability of great printer profiles (although the PRO-1 marketing team did a brilliant job of getting a ton of fantastic profiles for third party papers for it too). There’s also better third party RIP software for the Epson printers (3880 and up), so if that is important to you then Epson is the way to go. Products like like ColorByte ImagePrint also make brilliant prints, offer free great paper profiles and fantastic features like hot folders which make it a great solution for the office environment where you want drag and drop photo printing.

Canon iPF6450
Canon iPF6450 – Large Print Heaven!
iPF6400, iPF6450, iPF8400 and iPF9400 at B&H
iPF6400, iPF6450, iPF8400 and iPF9400 at Amazon

Please check out my printer reviews and printing series page for more information. Here’s my reviews so far:

If I could only pick one it would have to be the P800 simply because it produces near 4900 quality prints via a easy to use wireless configuration that was a snap to setup. It’s just stupid easy to get going making fantastic prints. If the Canon PIXMA PRO-1 was wireless, then it would have easily been my first choice due to its outstanding color and black and white performance – so I can’t wait to review the  new imagePROGRAF PRO-1000. With all of these new printers, Epson loses it’s edge in a mature ICC paper profile base, so it’s domination will certainly be challenged by Canon in the next couple years.

My next choice would probably be the iPF6450 because it’s go large, or go home! The Canon LUCIA EX ink set is fantastic, and this printer is a dream to use (the Photoshop Export Module and Accounting Manager are brilliant)!.

For Black & White prints on the PRO-1 (Adorama, Amazon, or B&H) are delicious so if I was a black and white only print master then I’d be hard pressed not to own the PRO-1 (mainly due the advantage of the clear Chroma optimizer ink). As a result, I’m suspecting the new  imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 will do very well in this category despite the fact that P800 is extremely impressive too.

If I was doing fine art sheets of cut paper (which I prefer) then there’s really nothing better than the 3880 (Amazon, B&H or Adorama), so I’m in the process of doing part II of my SureColor P800 review (due in early 2016) to share my verdict on how it compares to the 3880. It’s too early to call this one, so for right now I’ll refrain from making a recommendation.

So yeah, I love both platforms and think you can’t go wrong with either! Seriously!

Conclusion

As I state in my Printing 101 eBook, these are exciting times in photography and the experience of controlling the process from capture to physical output is a blast. Printing doesn’t have to be a pain in the ass and cost you a fortune creating prints that look terrible compared to what you see on your screen. This is why I dedicated over a year of my life to adding content to help people enjoy the world of self-printing like many film photographers enjoyed developing their own prints.

Happy Printing!

P.S. One last note – NEVER, EVER buy third party inks. I can’t stress enough how stupid it is to not use the OEM inks by Canon and Epson in their printers as that’s one of the most important factors in getting great results. Putting generic ink or doing refills is like buying a Ferrari and putting an old Yugo engine in it! It just makes ZERO sense! Cut corners on paper if you must, but DO NOT USE third party ink – PERIOD!

Where to order

Please click the photos or article links mentioned in this article to learn more or order your printer. It helps to support this blog and it really encourages me to add more printing related content.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, please check out my Printing Series.  You may also enjoy these Canon articles:

and these Epson articles:

and be sure to visit the bottom of my Printing Series page for a bunch of great articles that apply to both platforms. You will also appreciate my discount coupon code page where I occasionally have printer paper special offers.

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this. Canon and Epson have also both provided printers, paper and ink for my review, but neither have paid any monetary compensation or for advertising.